User blog comment:The Milkman/No Love For Leviathan?/@comment-24174486-20120915231103/@comment-4237253-20120916183251

Again, you are missing my point entirely. I'm not saying that we have to believe in what the Catalyst is saying. I'm not saying it's forcing us to think a certain way when making the desicion. What I am saying is this: '''the fact that its even brought up is the problem in itself. The conflict should not exist at all this late in the narrative.'''

I am not focusing on the Catalyst's problem. It comes out of nowhere and becomes the centre of your debate with the Catalyst. The fact that the Catalyst's problem even exists at all is the problem with the ending. The main conflict is now sharing space with another that was just introduced as being important. The climax and resolution of the story is supposed to wrap up the conflict, not introduce a new one.