User blog comment:Mr. Mittens/Why It Had To Happen/@comment-1440333-20130227193907/@comment-217683-20130228110003

Indeed. On the amusing claim of civil disobedience, to borrow from a classic film -

You keep using that phrase. I do not think it means what you think it means.

As Tiredman2 points out, civil disobedience pretty much requires accepting the punishment for breaking the unjust law in order to demonstrate that the law is unjust. You have, to the best of my knowledge, also failed to make a compelling case that the policy is unjust. Just saying it is repeatedly doesn't make it so.