User blog comment:Kaloneous/Mass Effect 3 Ending DLC Denied and PAX/@comment-4043223-20120411233436/@comment-30303790-20120412031724

If what she says is official, then there are a few implications I could see:
 * Indoc. Theory is false. Not just false in the sense that this hasnt been a massive surpise and Bioware was going to treat us to a "real" ending, but that it cannot be right. Whether its BW way of saying "we'll change, but to hell with you" is up to you., after all its hard to say we wanted fans to have their own interpretations...just not the one that unified them against us, or it means the extended cut will require this detail to be solidified.
 * Indoc. Theory changes. Until the DLC is released which canonizes what happens to Shepard comes out, the theory could modify itself. So instead of waking up where you were hit by the beam, Shepard awakes where his/her body was "taken" while under the effects of indoctrination. If this was the case, the arguement could be made the Reapers planned on Shepard making it to the Citadel. Once there, they could use Shep to disable/disconnect/unplug the Crusible from the inside, and this means that instead of waking back on earth its mostly with only a few alterations.

Or we can all just compromise and say the Shepard is on the Citadel, which just happened to crash in London.