User blog comment:The Milkman/End of the Line/@comment-4950455-20120701220030/@comment-4950455-20120702034422

I'm not talking about any sort of IT-style "everything it says is a lie" idea. I never believed that in the first place.

But there have been walls and walls of text written, here on this wiki and elsewhere, about how flawed the Catalyst's argument of an inevitable synthetic-organic conflict is, and while the EC did address a few of those flaws, by making the Catalyst into a more explicitly malevolent/antagonistic figure (which in my view was one of its bigger positives), it gives me even less reason to take this claim at face value.

I'm not going to buy into its warped logic, and it's whether the endings do that I see as pros and cons for them, not whether they address this bogus "problem".