User blog comment:Kaloneous/Mass Effect 3 Ending DLC Denied and PAX/@comment-4043223-20120323231035/@comment-1341687-20120325174932

@Nick You're referencing one of the four IG-88s, I believe it was IG-88A, which aren't canon because they are just novels written. And if you disagree with that, then you don't understand how or why the extended universe operates in Star Wars lore. So your point holds no water.

And I understood Contact perfectly. I understand that it is showing itself as it is to make the acceptance of its existence easier. But the movie frankly sucked. And not getting to see the alien was a kick in the balls added to a slap in the face that was already occurring.

It's hilarious how you keep saying your sides of the argument are ignored. But when you don't say anything it's easy to pass over your "points". The thousands of people who are asking for closure out number you and your 22 "friends". Which only someone who has nothing to back up what they are saying would list a numerical "friend" argument as a basis for their side. So I will do my best to sort through your terrible grammar and spelling and try and address all of your "issues".

1. What people are claiming it currently has a cliche Hollywood ending? As it stands now it most certainly doesn't as Hollywood is 9/10 smart enough to avoid something like this. 2.While I am in the minority thinking that a "Happy" ending isn't needed, people expected closure. As it stands you can do the whole game without even trying to raise War Assets because they are a number that doesn't affect your endgame. Don't try and say dialog and characters effect the endgame, because all of that is interchangeable when I'm still presented with the same three options. 3.Haven't heard anyone say that the harvesting of organics didn't make sense. This seems to be your own experience. The difference in this cycle is that peace was actually brokered for the first time (that we know of since we only have Javik's word on the Zha and Zha'til) between organics and synthetics. Peace may not last, but it is an anomaly that it even happened in the first place. 4.Who called for a retreat? Not of the ground forces but of the fleet? Why is Joker seemingly the only one who listened? Why would he even do that? That's completely out of character for him. 5.Similar does not mean Same, you're right. But if I'm given a choice of three cookies that have different chocolate chips, does it really matter which I take? And only one of those cookies has a possibility to lead to another cookie. 6. People didn't complain then because despite everything we were told that even without a true happy ending things that we did mattered. But as I showed above, they don't. It's just the same puzzle, the same pieces, just a slightly different picture. 7. Changes to creative work is how things work in the creative world. The technological one at least. I could point to any revived canceled TV show, movie extension, game sequel changes, DLC additions, but I don't have that kind of time to waste. 8. It doesn't ask people to go down a safe route. We would be upset if they had did that as well. The problems are that they decided that in order to answer "Why the Reapers do what they do" they needed to eliminate any semblance of the work we put in to try to fight them. Which for me, makes sense in a lot of ways. War isn't going to always end up how you want it to. One life for trillions, make the ultimate sacrifice. But they give us nigh complete control over everything, just to take it from us at the end. 9. Our choices don't do anything you claim they do concerning the Crucible or the difficulty of the end game. If they actually did, I'm sure people would be a little less miffed. 10. You keep claiming people have ignored you, when in fact they've addressed your concerns and some of your "ignoring" from "stupid" questions are issues that you brought up that nobody mentioned before hand in this particular line, such as your issues about "seeds". So it's quite easy for things to be buried.

Quite simply, you appear to only want to be "right" and that comes down to name calling, suggestions about others intelligence and flat out ignoring what others have said. If you can't be constructive in arguing your points, nor take the time to make sure they are read by letting them correctly spelled, punctuated, etc. Then you have no claim to being "right" because that just simply isn't so.