User talk:Mr. Mittens

Moving Pages
Note that we ask users to not move pages unilaterally, but rather propose a move, then discuss it, then move it. That said, the article was just moved because of one such discussion. Any additional move would require another discussion but, per site policy, but be started in one week from today. Moves are only carried out without discussion in extreme circumstances, and this wasn't one of them. Every move proposal has a discussion, but again one cannot take place for a week per site policy on moving articles. Keep this in mind in the future. Lancer1289 00:25, March 14, 2012 (UTC)


 * Again, please do not move pages without prior discussion; refer to Lancer's original warning above. If you continue to move pages in this manner, you may receive additional warnings and/or a block if necessary. Regarding this move (Borealis to MSV Borealis), note that there is no evidence that the Borealis ever bore the MSV designation. As such, even if this move had been properly discussed, it could not be carried out because it would be based on speculation. -- Commdor (Talk) 01:41, March 28, 2012 (UTC)

Edit Reasons
Hi, i undid your edit as it wasn't referenced. If you can find a confirmed source that says that the harrier is based on the auto mattock from infiltrator, then by all means re do it and include the reference. hope thats ok with you, sanjay

Your Persistent Attitude
I am going to say this now because I am getting sick and tired of it. On everything that I see, you keep asking people to explain why they are voting the way they are, and since this has not seemed to sunk in yet, I will say that it is not only rude, but rather insulting. No one here is under any obligation to explain how they are voting, or why they voted that way. I do not see you pestering people who vote with you, so I think that the only reason you keep pestering people is that you do not like it when people do not agree with you.

Since I do not know where you live, and that is your right and I have no right to intrude on it, I will use an example that I see very day. When people vote in just about any election in the US, the average people who votes, and is not the eye of a TV camera, will generally not tell you who they voted for, why they voted for that person, or why they voted for that particular party. Asking them for that information will turn them off, and they will tell you that it is rude of you to ask.

Therefore, as I have explained in now two separate locations, I will ask that you cease and desist asking people to explain why they vote against you, as that is the only time you seem to ask. Anyone here can vote any way they want and are not required to explain why to you or anyone else. It is more than enough that we ask people to vote and sign their user name, as that is much more than most countries on this planet ask. They are under no obligations to answer to you, or anyone else, why they vote that way. Again, this is rude and arrogant behavior that you are almost forcing people to do what they are under no obligations to do. Lancer1289 01:13, May 31, 2012 (UTC)


 * I don't believe I was wrong for being curious, but looking back at yesterday's logs, you obviously had an awful day, so I'd like to apologize all the same. Mr. Mittens 19:50, May 31, 2012 (UTC)
 * Did you seriously just compare the vote to rename a webpage to a Presidential election? I think you're taking this website FAR too seriously. There is absolutely nothing wrong with Mr. Mittens asking for somebody to explain their vote. There is, however, something heinously wrong with YOUR attitude. I don't care how bad your day was. You think you're in a position of real authority here. No matter how imaginary that shared authority over a fan-made website is, ACT LIKE THE PROFESSIONAL YOUVE DELUDED YOURSELF TO BE. 76.171.184.23 21:46, May 31, 2012 (UTC)
 * Dude, don't force the issue. Yes, I'm bothered by the fact that he devoted more paragraphs to yelling at me then the guy who called us all faggots in the same discussion. Yes, I could get into it with him about if I wanted to. But I really don't like getting into arguments with people online, especially since everybody seems to have such an shit attitude around here. I don't need some mysterious stranger swooping in to fight unjustice on my talk page.  Mr. Mittens 22:03, May 31, 2012 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. It's refreshing to see a nice person here, for the record. 76.171.184.23 22:06, May 31, 2012 (UTC)

Modifying Comments Left By Other Users
Note that removing or modifying comments left by another user is an extremely bannable offense. You are not The Milkman, and therefore, you have zero right to remove or modify their comments. Comments are the property of the user that left them an no one else is permitted to modify or remove them. Further violations of this policy will lead to a ban. Lancer1289 15:48, June 24, 2012 (UTC)


 * Can you specify where I did this? I honestly can't see a difference in his comment here. Mr. Mittens 18:41, June 24, 2012 (UTC)

Right here apparently. I guess it's the principle of the matter.

--The Milkman | I always deliver. 18:46, June 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * (edit conflict) That is because I reverted it. Direct your attention here for your answer. Your edit added a colon before The Milkman's comment. Are you The Milkman? The answer to that is no. So therefore you have zero right to modify The Milkman's comments. Do not do this again. Lancer1289 18:48, June 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * I see it now. I guess I was trying to make it easier to read, since somebody left an unsigned comment right above yours. Speaking of which, I thought there was a rule against that? Mr. Mittens 18:51, June 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * There is no rule per se, while we ask users to sign their comments, the fact remains that often, not many do, especially newer users, users who just don't care, and unregistered users. Lancer1289 19:04, June 24, 2012 (UTC)

Bad Troll is Bad
For shame. He's a hero you know. :(--Eden2012 (talk) 04:37, August 9, 2012 (UTC)
 * You're not even a good troll. --Mr. Mittens (talk) 04:40, August 9, 2012 (UTC)

Good sir, I only troll on weekends, and it usually follows the troll stereotype. Meaning, there is no such thing as a bad troll. To the point, why do you despise so hellaciously a genu-ine war hero?--Eden2012 (talk) 04:54, August 9, 2012 (UTC)
 * Because he fought for the wrong side. --Mr. Mittens (talk) 04:54, August 9, 2012 (UTC)


 * One could argue that is a purely subjective statement. I found him to be in direct ideological contrast with rEApers.--Eden2012 (talk) 04:59, August 9, 2012 (UTC)

He is not a hero, he is a miserable failure who had full health and shields and couldn't even manage to kill a critically injured human who was only armed with a level one pistol.--Legionwrex (talk) 05:02, August 9, 2012 (UTC)


 * Your argument would have merit... if Marauder Shields was also granted infinite ammunition.--Eden2012 (talk) 05:07, August 9, 2012 (UTC)
 * Mr. Mittens, I know it is your talk page, but I would highly suggest that this troll be cut off from food. If he continues, there is harassment that can come into play. Lancer1289 (talk) 05:09, August 9, 2012 (UTC)
 * Enough of this, I know you're only trying to have fun but you're annoying other people, please stop.--Legionwrex (talk) 05:10, August 9, 2012 (UTC)

Well, I did get your attention, so it all worked out. I wasn't planning on going any further with this. --Mr. Mittens (talk) 05:13, August 9, 2012 (UTC)

Thanks
Thank you for correcting the grammar of my Geth Turret page. It was well appreciated. TheRello99 (Talk) 3:56pm 16 August 2012
 * No problem, nobody's immune to little grammar errors every now and then. --Mr. Mittens (talk) 15:13, August 16, 2012 (UTC)

Closing Your Blog
As it was brought to my attention by a Wikia Staff Member, there have been a lot of violations on your Comic blog. Because certain things not only violated our policies, but Wikia's terms of use, I felt that closing it would prevent another incident where someone could be globally banned from Wikia, in fact, two were close. I'm sure neither you or I want that. I still have to go through all of the comments to find things, and this probably would have been dealt with sooner, but the literal spamming of blogs recently has prevented Commdor and myself from reading all of the comments. If you have further questions, don't hesitate to ask. Lancer1289 (talk) 18:41, August 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * I know what you mean about the spamming of blogs recently. The timing of mine really couldn't have been worse. But exactly what terms of use were being violated? Other than the language violation, I hadn't really noticed anything. I'm not trying to appeal your decisions, but I'd like to know the exact reasons it was made. --Mr. Mittens (talk) 18:47, August 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * Death threats. I don't think more needs to be said. Lancer1289 (talk) 18:48, August 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * Ah, I see. Well, closing the blog post is a good alternative to perma-banning those involved. I totally understand. It certainly was fun while it lasted, though. --Mr. Mittens (talk) 18:51, August 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * I will be deleting comments as well since that was requested. The full text is on my talk page. Lancer1289 (talk) 18:59, August 20, 2012 (UTC)

You Have Entered The "Twilight Zone", even though Limelight is a much better song
hey you...Go Packers GARBAGE DAY!Charles Saracino 03:08, August 30, 2012 (UTC)

[[

Link title
[[Media:

Example.ogg--Charles Saracino 03:13, August 30, 2012 (UTC) Insert non-formatted text here ]]]]YOU ARE INDOCTRINATED AND YOU DONT EVEN KNOW IT, Vote Terra --Charles Saracino 03:13, August 30, 2012 (UTC) Insert non-formatted text here [[Media:[Example.ogg]Italic text[[Link title[[Media:Example.ogg]]]]]]

Banana Nuts! Festigio

8=D <---Its a Penis

It's hard to go to work with a Boner! It's hard to drive a car with a Boner! It's hard to mow the lawn with a Boner! It's hard to go to sleep with a Boner!

Ba-ba-ba-ba-ba-ba-ba Ba-ba-ba-ba-ba-ba-ba-Baaaaaah!

It's weird to pet your cat with a Boner! It's weird to hug your mom with a Boner! It's weird to host thanksgiving with a Boner! It's weird to feed your kid with a Boner!

Ba-ba-ba-ba-ba-ba-ba Ba-ba-ba-ba-ba-ba-ba-Baaaaaah!

Never trim your hedges with a Boner! Never make a promise with a Boner! Never slam a door with a Boner! Never write a sketch with a Boneeeer!
 * This ain't vandalism, folks. We're analyzing it for research purposes. --Mr. Mittens (talk) 03:41, August 30, 2012 (UTC)

Yeah Man Research man like the manhatten Projek or The Lolocaust Charles Saracino 03:46, August 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * Mahattan Prejek Paddle Fish? --Mr. Mittens (talk) 03:47, August 30, 2012 (UTC)

And... what is the nature of this "research" purposes? 03:50, August 30, 2012 (UTC)

Research Man like for the Betterment of man kind like how Nixon had Kennedy shot in 63' or how the Bioware Writers indoctrinated Mr Mittens into thinking hes right about anything ever, also im trying to learn how the wiki works in a jokingly sort of way with my buddy man Charles Saracino 03:53, August 30, 2012 (UTC)

INDOCTRINATION THEORY DID 9/11

Leviathan II
Almost every game has something that's "overpowered." Be the Atlas guns in Borderlands or the heavies in Assassin's Creed. I thought that since everyone complains, it would stay as "the forums" part. --Slowrider7 (talk) 00:06, August 31, 2012 (UTC)
 * Yeah, if you want to you can go ahead, but players are always complaining about the synced kills that those two enemies have, so I have a feeling that the line is poking fun at that. --Mr. Mittens (talk) 00:08, August 31, 2012 (UTC)

Twilight Zone, Pt. 2
Nobody should Make fun of Major Mittens the Man is a SAINT Man $$E=MC^2$$ --Charles Saracino 02:21, August 31, 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh hey, I didn't see you there. --Mr. Mittens (talk) 02:39, August 31, 2012 (UTC)

Also AIDS isnt funny --Charles Saracino 05:56, September 1, 2012 (UTC)

Man. I just compared Charles Saracino's profile to you'res. He RELLY don't like you. Do you have any idea why? --User:Traditionalfire 08:47, September 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * We get along just fine, if you must know. --Mr. Mittens (talk) 15:05, September 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * Does anyone else notice that on his profile page in the first paragraph in the second to last line that he says that he hates the Mass Effect series. Am I the only one to think that it's odd for someone to contribute to a wiki of a series that they hate? Bluegear93 (talk) 15:18, September 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * His user page is a very obvious joke, you just have to find the set up. --Mr. Mittens (talk) 15:20, September 4, 2012 (UTC)

Its not a Joke, i believe he is telling the truth, why would he so blatenly lie  -- Not Charles Saracino 05:56, September 1, 2012 (UTC)


 * You may get yourself permanently banned for sock puppetry, if that IP account is connected to User:Charles Saracino. See community guidelines. Trandra (talk) 18:02, September 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * Wow, are you seriously implying this? I'd love to see you find evidence of that, because it's not true. Do you really think I'd waste my time conversing with myself like this? I've conversed with TW6464 and he's gotten banned, maybe he's my sockpuppet? The last thing we need right now is to turn on each other. --Mr. Mittens (talk) 18:07, September 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * i think trandra was referring to -not- charles saracino, not you. T̴̴͕̲̞̳̖̼̱͒͛̎͒ͫ̃ͧeͩ̈̽̈҉͓̝̰̼̦̫̤̀͠m̫̪̪̯̻͎̫̅̇̓̇͌̚p̸̙̝̓̓͌ͨ͆ͣͥ̂̕o͒̽͐̽͏̞̬̻͕͔͕͚̰͍͠͞ṙ̢̞͚͈̹̰ͨ̓ͭ̈́̌ạ̢̧̪̹̺̺̣̹̲͂͆̏ͪͨ͒ͭř̹͈͜͠y̷͍̻̜̹̼̾̽̈́e̵̹̼̟̦͚͐̈́͌͘d͉̲̣̻͉̱͗̅ḭ̷̻̆͋̆̓̔͝t̨͍̦̫̗͂̅̍̋̆ͩ͝ộ̫̟̬̳̝̲̾ͫ̒̿ͮ̑̚rͯ̎ͨͭ̄̿̽͛҉̠̫̱̠̘̘̲́ͅ7̩̻ͤͩͨ͝͡8̜̣̙͇̻ͨ͛͛̆͒̆̽̒͐͜͡ ͥ̍̉̃̇ͥ̓ͨ͏̕҉̥̹͓̗̤̠̖̤ (talk) 18:14, September 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * Let's just say he's not the first person to accuse me of that in relation to this. But you know what? Even if it is him on my page, I really don't mind. I welcome all to say what they wish here. --Mr. Mittens (talk) 18:16, September 4, 2012 (UTC)

The supposed sock puppets comment was made on the first of this month, that was before Charles was banned.--Legionwrex (talk) 18:19, September 4, 2012 (UTC)

It looks like someone just trying to make a joke at another misfortune, who knows the internet is a complicated entity --Gavin Hossel (talk)
 * Just pointing out that even if we have a hint of sock puppetry, an admin can ban someone. Lancer1289 (talk) 20:46, September 4, 2012 (UTC)

Im not even really sure what "sock puppetry really is" --Gavin Hossel (talk) 21:08, September 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * It's making dummy accounts when you already have one. To use for trolling or to create artificial supporters. --Mr. Mittens (talk) 21:09, September 4, 2012 (UTC)

Ah, okay --Gavin Hossel (talk) 21:19, September 4, 2012 (UTC)


 * (This is probably too late after my original comment.) Mr. Mittens, I was not accusing you of sock puppetry, just trying to help anonymous users that may or may not be Charles Saracino avoid being permanently banned. (With the back and forth User talk page editing that happened last week, you'd either have multiple personality disorder, or you are two different people. Occam's Razor would suggest the latter.)


 * Also, I happen to be a "she." Not that I expect people to check my user page for my gender all the time. :) Trandra (talk) 04:57, September 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * That's fine, but as I said, you wouldn't have been the first person to accuse me of that here.--Mr. Mittens (talk) 12:11, September 5, 2012 (UTC)

The only thing wrong with Leviathan
Eyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy Its Jimmie Vega --Gavin Hossel (talk) 20:41, September 4, 2012 (UTC)

Misrepresentation
I will ask you once to remove what you put on Ardent Clerk Bosker Apologist‎'s talk page. You are misrepresenting yourself and the wiki by pretending to be an admin, which you aren't. If you do not comply with this request in 12 hours, then I will do it myself. I will also like you to explain what you did and why to that user and promise to never to it again. Lancer1289 (talk) 03:03, September 10, 2012 (UTC)
 * Just tryin' to be helpful... --Mr. Mittens (talk) 03:05, September 10, 2012 (UTC)
 * That is an auto generated messages that Wikia does with a bot. The user name, on every wiki, is to be the last admin or staff member to edit the wiki, in this case Commdor. The message is to give them a place to go if they have questions in an official capacity. Do not misrepresent yourself again. Lancer1289 (talk) 03:07, September 10, 2012 (UTC)
 * Not to mention they never even edited that page so it was completely inappropriate, in all respects. Lancer1289 (talk) 03:09, September 10, 2012 (UTC)

the edit on Tali's unique dialouge page
Thanks, I wasn't sure how to do that!

Borderline insults/inflammatory comments
Please refrain from making derogatory comments toward other editors, such as "You've got a little something brown on your nose, Legion." This comment seems needlessly inflammatory and adds nothing constructive to the discussion. The second half of your comment, suggesting that the discussion be left to the involved parties, was not only acceptable, it was commendable. There's no reason to sully it with crass comments toward others. SpartHawg948 (talk) 06:26, September 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * At least you read the second half of my post. --Mr. Mittens (talk) 12:31, September 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * Had to. Context is everything. And, as I said before, you were pretty much right. SpartHawg948 (talk) 00:57, September 19, 2012 (UTC)

Why remove my trivia?
On the power combos page--Hello (talk) 18:49, September 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * I didn't outright remove them, I integrated it into the page in a manner that doesn't put it at the very bottom of the page. Your info is still there. --Mr. Mittens (talk) 18:51, September 18, 2012 (UTC)

Don't undo my Indoctrination Theory blurb
What I wrote is factual and sourced. Moleman 9000'' 01:25, September 27, 2012 (UTC)
 * No, it wasn't. This wiki doesn't add fan material. We've removed that crap several times. --Mr. Mittens (talk) 01:30, September 27, 2012 (UTC)

Yes it is. I cited three sources from reliable sites, and clearly separated it from the canon, in–universe material in the article. Moleman 9000'' 02:17, September 27, 2012 (UTC)
 * You're missing the point. We don't include non-canon things like this. --Mr. Mittens (talk) 02:19, September 27, 2012 (UTC)

Operation Concentrated Effort
Operation Concentrated Effort is now on, and you have been chosen for the lead of Project Collective, focusing on the Multiplayer Articles. The basic control page for the project can be found here and you can update the project goals as necessary. Please remember that communication and cooperation is vital to the project. I have also left a note on the page for possible collaboration on certain points of the project that overlap with another.

Good luck. Lancer1289 (talk) 20:44, October 5, 2012 (UTC)

That is an Understatment
I'm deadbeat exhausted. Driving for 4 hours today wasn't fun and I really need a nap. Therefore this will be the second to last thing I do before I go knock myself out. Lancer1289 (talk) 21:29, October 5, 2012 (UTC)

My Formal Apology
Dear Projective Collective Lead Mr. mittens, It is with great sadness that I must inform you that I cannot assist with Project Collective's objective. I simply have too much homework and schoolwork to contribute anything. I am truly sorry and I hope that you understand my reasonings. I will attempt to help contribute when I can.

From, Project Collective member, TW6464 (talk) 17:26, October 8, 2012 (UTC)
 * Alright, that's ok. Take it at your own pace. --Mr. Mittens (talk) 17:27, October 8, 2012 (UTC)
 * Dear Project Collective Head, Mr. Mittens,

I am glad that you understand my reasoning, and, as I have stated before, I will contribute when there is time available. This week is the last week of my school's first quarter, and therefore, many examinations will take place on Friday, and there is a football game that my school's band must play at, so I will NOT be available that day. Thank you for understanding. From your fellow member of Project Collective, --TW6464 (talk) 17:33, October 8, 2012 (UTC)

The Triumphant Return
Yo Dawg, I heard you was looking for some real old school help--Springrollio (talk) 20:01, October 10, 2012 (UTC)
 * You came to the right place, soldier. Report for duty here. There will always be a place for men like us. --Mr. Mittens (talk) 20:11, October 10, 2012 (UTC)

No doubt, just leave me a message on what you want me to specifically do,--Boss Hoss (talk) 20:28, October 10, 2012 (UTC)

Collective
mr.mittens, im sorry for lying and saying i had no time this week, when, judging from the edits i've made, i did. to say that Lancer p****d off with me is a serious understatement. I just hope you and Tranda aren't angry with me.... I think I've made enough enemies on this wiki as it is....--TW6464 (talk) 20:22, October 10, 2012 (UTC)
 * I have absolutely no problem with what you were doing over the past few days. You were pretty active on the blogs, but I did observe that you were making edits to MP related articles. You are most certainly not alone in that category. Many other users are making blog comments even while working on projects, and there is absolutely nothing wrong with that. Lancer has made it very clear that he doesn't like the fact that we have a community on the wiki. This project is his attempt to get people to stop making blogs and focus on maintenance. He doesn't realize that the people who are focused on the community will always remain there, while those who are more interested in maintenance will always remain there. I don't believe that it's proper conduct to attempt to force users to make edits. Most of the people who've been making edits on things that fall under Collective are not signed up for, or possibly even aware of the projects. --Mr. Mittens (talk) 20:44, October 10, 2012 (UTC)
 * Phew, thanks for understanding, Mr.Mittens! I'll get back to work ASAP.TW6464 (talk) 20:49, October 10, 2012 (UTC)

Truth--Boss Hoss (talk) 20:46, October 10, 2012 (UTC)
 * Great to see you back Gavin!TW6464 (talk) 20:49, October 10, 2012 (UTC)

Mistake Mittens, you sent me a private message I never got,--Boss Hoss (talk) 22:17, October 10, 2012 (UTC)
 * Forget about it, we'll talk later. --Mr. Mittens (talk) 22:20, October 10, 2012 (UTC)

Oh am I going to be grounded again? You are so mysterious sometimes, like the enigmatic Wang (Crackdown reference) --Boss Hoss (talk) 22:22, October 10, 2012 (UTC)

Wow, The Falsehood
I literally cannot believe what you said in your comment above. I am beyond outright insulted by you in your completely incorrect statements, which comes from your arrogance and ignorance of the entire situation. I actually don't have a problem with blogs or a community, something you are misinformed about. I have problems when someone lies to my face and when people abuse things. Your persistently rude attitude towards me is something I find distasteful about you and the fact you seem to be doing little to either be more polite, or inform yourself about the situation.

So thanks for insulting me without cause or full knowledge.

And FYI, I wasn't forcing someone to do anything, I asked for an explanation and made a request, that is all. So also thanks for putting words in my mouth and twisting the sitaution. Lancer1289 (talk) 20:57, October 10, 2012 (UTC)
 * After seeing you make several comments regarding that there were too many blog posts on the wiki, literally call one of them a "waste of space" despite that fact that it contained quite a bit of material, vote against a proposal that would expand community communication methods, and put forward a project that would "shift the wiki away from [social elements]", I was under the impression that you were anti-community and pro-maintenance, a stance that I think is completely reasonable to have when you are an administrator. Just telling me that I'm lying to your face isn't going to change my opinion, because your actions are responsible for me reaching it. I'm not looking for an argument here, but I see no reason why I can't freely state my own opinions about this on my talk page. --Mr. Mittens (talk) 21:21, October 10, 2012 (UTC)
 * There is a very fine line between saying incorrect statements, and expressing opinions. You crossed that line. You said false statements, twisted my words, and put words in my mouth. Lancer1289 (talk) 22:32, October 10, 2012 (UTC)
 * The line is subjective. Only a third party can accurately judge if it was crossed. --Mr. Mittens (talk) 22:41, October 10, 2012 (UTC)

Lol--Boss Hoss (talk) 21:10, October 10, 2012 (UTC)
 * Gavin.... you're not helping this situation....--TW6464 (talk) 21:13, October 10, 2012 (UTC)

I'm not trying to, also, where on God's green Earth is the chat?--Boss Hoss (talk) 21:15, October 10, 2012 (UTC)

I hate to intrude on something I have nothing to do with, but Lancer, you did say, on TW6464's talk page, that you feel that blogs take the attention away from the real point of the wiki, which is information. It's very, very easy to interpret that as saying that you don't like the social aspect of the wiki. Leon S. Kennedy AKA Shepard 22:39, October 10, 2012 (UTC)
 * Speak of the devil, a third party appears. --Mr. Mittens (talk) 22:42, October 10, 2012 (UTC)

So good being back, this is so classic Mass Effect Wiki Drama, lol its like high school all over again --Boss Hoss (talk) 22:54, October 10, 2012 (UTC)

This wiki has become a small community of its own. Let us not destroy it with such hostility. Sure, we have differences, but we can overcome them by agreeing on compromises. Although this wiki is an info guide to the ME universe, it has become a hub for social activities as well. Some people may not like it, believing it to be an unneeded distraction from the true purpose of the wiki. But lets face it, its because of all of our contributions that the wiki is what it is, an informative encyclopedia. Some members would claim their contributions held more gravity, but they can't discredit the efforts put in by the others who are apparently at fault with the system. We are all working together and its only natural that social activities would also increase. We can't evade this social aspect, it is an essential element of progression. Both the work and the social activity are tied together, as a part of a greater whole. So come on, bloggers and editors, lets make this wiki a better place.--SolitaryReaper (talk) 23:23, October 10, 2012 (UTC)
 * You sure you meant "socialism"? I dunno, I think that's not the word you were looking for. Leon S. Kennedy AKA Shepard 23:28, October 10, 2012 (UTC)
 * Amen, SolitaryReaper!--TW6464 (talk) 11:28, October 11, 2012 (UTC)

unsolicited and unwanted 3rd party declaration: i'll just leave what lancer actually said. i'd say this whole thing is just another unfortunate case of misunderstanding and somebody needs to kiss, make up, pat each other's backs and move on with improving the wiki. no h*m*. form your own opinions.

on a completely unrelated tangent, chat's up and you're chatmod. grats. T̴̴͕̲̞̳̖̼̱͒͛̎͒ͫ̃ͧeͩ̈̽̈҉͓̝̰̼̦̫̤̀͠m̫̪̪̯̻͎̫̅̇̓̇͌̚p̸̙̝̓̓͌ͨ͆ͣͥ̂̕o͒̽͐̽͏̞̬̻͕͔͕͚̰͍͠͞ṙ̢̞͚͈̹̰ͨ̓ͭ̈́̌ạ̢̧̪̹̺̺̣̹̲͂͆̏ͪͨ͒ͭř̹͈͜͠y̷͍̻̜̹̼̾̽̈́e̵̹̼̟̦͚͐̈́͌͘d͉̲̣̻͉̱͗̅ḭ̷̻̆͋̆̓̔͝t̨͍̦̫̗͂̅̍̋̆ͩ͝ộ̫̟̬̳̝̲̾ͫ̒̿ͮ̑̚rͯ̎ͨͭ̄̿̽͛҉̠̫̱̠̘̘̲́ͅ7̩̻ͤͩͨ͝͡8̜̣̙͇̻ͨ͛͛̆͒̆̽̒͐͜͡ ͥ̍̉̃̇ͥ̓ͨ͏̕҉̥̹͓̗̤̠̖̤ (talk) 12:39, October 11, 2012 (UTC)
 * Ah, thanks. Hopefully we can move on from whatever the hell you would call this. --Mr. Mittens (talk) 12:52, October 11, 2012 (UTC)

Chat Moderator RC Color
At this time, I would like to direct your attention to Forum:Chat Moderator RC Color. In this space, you and the other chat moderator can nominate and vote on a unique color for yourselves to appear in the RC. You two can open voting at any time, and when you are finished, contact me to implement the changes for you. Since B'Crats, Admins, and Senior Editors enjoy this privilege, then you as chat moderators should enjoy the same privilege. Good day. Lancer1289 (talk) 15:13, October 11, 2012 (UTC)


 * congrats, mr.mittens--TW6464 (talk) 15:43, October 11, 2012 (UTC)

Off Topic Discussions
It doesn't matter if no one is interested in talking about ME or not, it is your job to keep things on topic. Persistant off topic discussions are not the point of the Chat. Quote "Discussions in the Chat are to be related in some way to either the Mass Effect universe, the wiki, or Mass Effect fan-fiction. Topics of conversation that are not related to Mass Effect are considered off-topic discussions. Off-topic discussions are allowed to a degree, but if they become disruptive or the off-topic discussion continues, then it is the duty of people in the chat and moderators to turn the topic back to something Mass Effect related." That is the policy. Lancer1289 (talk) 17:04, October 15, 2012 (UTC)
 * While you were writing this, we were trying to ask you a question. --Mr. Mittens (talk) 17:06, October 15, 2012 (UTC)
 * Which was? Lancer1289 (talk) 17:07, October 15, 2012 (UTC)
 * We wanted to know what constitutes a "confirmed" twitter account. --Mr. Mittens (talk) 17:09, October 15, 2012 (UTC)
 * One of several things. A confirmed twitter account saying that is the twitter account of other person. Through an exterior trustworthy site pointing it out. Through an independently verifiable source that is also trustworthy. If you have information, then present it. Lancer1289 (talk) 17:16, October 15, 2012 (UTC)

Hail to the boss baby
f*** yeah man I did it --Boss Hoss (talk) 00:04, October 16, 2012 (UTC)
 * What did you get? --Mr. Mittens (talk) 00:05, October 16, 2012 (UTC)

I got conformation from the horses mouth can you jump on chat for a second? --Boss Hoss (talk) 00:07, October 16, 2012 (UTC)

Krogan Shaman: is he a she?
I just undid an edit that said that the Krogan Shaman Adept was a female. But I'm not sure about this. Am I wrong?--TW6464 (talk) 18:27, October 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * Shaman has the same lines as the other Krogan. No reason to think it's a female. -Mr. Mittens (talk) 18:34, October 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * alright then--TW6464 (talk) 18:49, October 24, 2012 (UTC)

Sorry to hear that
Personally, I thought it was one of the best of the series. Watching the terminal vids really helped me appreciate the character of the Didact more and the chemistry between Master Chief and Cortana was fantastic. I also enjoyed some of the newer characters like Laskey and Palmer. Even Sparatan Ops has been getting a lot more interesting with the newest chapter. I have no idea how you could hate it other than for it being "different". Aleksandr the Great (talk) 05:37, November 20, 2012 (UTC)

Clarification
It has been brought to my attention that you apparently consider this Wiki and its community to be a "cancerous cesspool", with at least one administrator, correction, one "pitiful excuse for an administrator" who is "devoid of human qualities" and is deserving of none, that we impose rules reminiscent of those imposed by a tyrant, and that no one here actually likes Mass Effect. Now, were this to come from some random editor, I wouldn't bat an eyelash. Haters gonna hate and all. But coming from someone who has been placed in a position of authority and entrusted to help the community, the very same community you so snidely refer to as a "cesspool", this is shocking, to say the least. Now, despite my apparently being intensely insecure, I thought I'd first seek clarification and ask for an explanation before taking any sort of action. Sorry to disappoint...

So, is the delightful comment linked to above an accurate representation of your opinion toward the community of this wiki? SpartHawg948 (talk) 07:05, January 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * Just so you know Spart, Mittens has been MIA for some time now, so if he doesn't respond, it's most likely because he didn't see it.--Legionwrex (talk) 07:18, January 23, 2013 (UTC)


 * Wouldn't a user's opinions as spoken on another wiki be between themselves and that wiki? Pardon me if I'm making an undue assumption, but wouldn't mentioning something from another website too much imply looking for things to pin someone with? And also, should not "taking... action" be something undertaken for actions and opinions expressed on this website? EzzyD (talk) 07:28, January 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * The problem EzzyD is that, like Spart said, Mitten's isn't just a user, he is also a Chat Moderator who is calling the very community he was given power to help a "cancerous cesspool".--Legionwrex (talk) 07:34, January 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * But he hasn't made this opinion known on this website, no? Then how he feels about this place when he's not here shouldn't really be anyone's business but his. Plenty of people hate their jobs when they leave them, but I'm pretty sure their superiors don't go around searching for evidence of them saying it; as long as they've been doing their jobs. Also, my apologies to Mr. Mittens for any invasion of his talk-page. EzzyD (talk) 07:38, January 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * Well that's another thing, he hasn't been doing his job for a while now...--Legionwrex (talk) 07:40, January 23, 2013 (UTC)

EzzyD, you seem to be under the impression that I was "going around searching for evidence" to "pin" Mr. Mittens with. I was not. As I said, this was brought to my attention, i.e. sent to me by a concerned third party. And, as LegionWrex has said, the concern here is more with the fact that Mr. Mittens holds a position in which he is expected to treat members of this community fairly and impartially. Prejudging them by labeling the community at large a "cancerous cesspool" calls into question his ability to do just that. Again, I'm merely seeking clarification here. SpartHawg948 (talk) 07:50, January 23, 2013 (UTC)