User blog comment:Elseweyr/Errors in Deception "Errors"/@comment-2250460-20131130091746/@comment-9753034-20131130094343

If you're referring to one of JakePT's blogs about dealing with the errors with respect to ME lore, this isn't the same thing (and he hadn't even read the novel at the time). There will always be the first edition of the novel and the list of errors to go with it, so the horse still draws breath.

I'm mainly criticising the google doc itself, because it claims detecting many of the errors requires "a more extensive knowledge of the canon" while being guilty of carelessness and even misinformation itself (talk about kettle calling the pot black). What bothers me is that as such, it's still widely accepted as a valid source of information. By this wiki, as well.