User blog comment:James12708/Reapers VS. Forerunners VS. Angels from Darksiders VS. Humanity from Halo VS. Council and humanity from Mass Effect VS. Imperium of Man/@comment-4967682-20130116065115/@comment-4967682-20130123051024


 * They also said they had a stronger military period. We ourselves list this on the Citadel Fleet page.
 * The ME races could do the exact same thing. Combined with the fact that the UNSC DIDN'T do that, even though according to you they could, and this doesn't help your argument.
 * Once again, Independence Day fallacy, speculation with no evidence, a baseless cop-out. You are assuming, with no evidence that a UNSC AI can completely hack billions of programs from a completely different universe.
 * You're right, we do not know the exact number GARDIAN turrets can shoot down. Making your assertion that Archers would be effective completely baseless. They're shown to be EXTREMELY weak against even Covenant hulls, taking hundreds plus a MAC round to breach the hulls (I should note that ME ships probably have considerably thicker armor than Halo ones, as a 1 km dreadnought has a mass of millions of tons while a 1.2 km Marathon cruiser has a mass of 100,000 tons).
 * The Reapers haven't been trying to advance. At all. They've been content to just run their cycle. An actively advancing galaxy could do wonderful things. And me saying "their tech will be better than the UNSC's" has the same amount of evidence behind it as "the UNSC's tech will be better than theirs". And once again, not even Forerunner technology can stand up to an RKV, the Forerunners could only survive the Reapers doing that because they're very numerous (I detailed this in the comments above).

Notice how at the very top of the page we were arguing over actual canon numbers for their firepower and maneuverability? Now all you're doing is blindly speculating since your previous assertions were proven wrong.