User blog comment:The Milkman/The Writing of the Ending/@comment-30764484-20120605044952/@comment-4237253-20120608060931

I have no evidence of bad writing? I just gave multiple conversation over the course of at least 1,000 words. And that's a minimum. Bad writing is bad. I never thought I'd have to explain that, but they're you go. Mass Effect 3 is a story. Gaming is a medium through which stories are often told. Mass Effect is centred on dialogue, roleplaying, and desicion-making. It's about crafting your own story. If the writing is bad...well that's just bad. I don't know how to further break that down.

As to your question: I don't know what it would take for me to believe in the IT. If I knew that, I would believe in it, and thus everything I'm writing is entirely moot.

Everything else is non sequitur. Assuming something is actually happening and is not just a dream is never an assumption. Neither is acknowledging the fact that the writing is bad, for the unequivocal reasons listed both above and in my other blog posts. I have just written a relatively well-received blog about why the ending to Mass Effect 3 is poorly written, as well as the Indoctrination Theory. How in the world did you convince yourself I have no evidence!?