User talk:Tullis

Hi there!
Welcome to our wiki, and thank you for your contributions! There's a lot to do around here, so I hope you'll stay with us and make many more improvements.


 * Recent changes is a great first stop, because you can see what other people are editing right this minute, and where you can help.


 * Please sign in, if you haven't already, and create a user name! It's free, and it'll help you keep track of all your edits.


 * Questions? You can ask at the Help desk or on the "discussion" page associated with each article, or post a message on my talk page!


 * Need help? The Community Portal has an outline of the site, and pages to help you learn how to edit.

I'm really happy to have you here, and look forward to working with you!

Great work so far. Keep it up!


 * JoePlay (talk) 20:25, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Good job!
I applaud all the effort you've put into the wiki. Thanks. --avfanatic (talk) 16:21, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

You're very welcome. :) -Tullis


 * Ditto what avfanatic said. You are indeed an asset to this wiki. JoePlay (talk) 22:17, 10 December 2007 (UTC)


 * I must thank you too. It's not long time since i found this great game and every time i want to know something about ME, i go here... Big thanks to you (watching wiki and doing great job) and other contributors for their work. --J.i.gorkij 19:00, 13 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks, on behalf of everyone. And welcome! --Tullis 19:39, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Adminship
Hey Tullis. I was going to leave a message on the talk page of the wiki's admins, but I noticed they've both been inactive for a fairly long time. Then I noticed your request for adminship, and checked your contribs to see that you're still active. So, I got my boss at Wikia to make you sysop (admin). Congrats! =) I know you'll be a good one.

The reason I came to the ME wiki today was to give a heads up about the PC release, which is coming very soon (28th of this month). While I don't expect a HUGE amount of new editors, I'm sure there will be a good bit. Since you're now the only active admin, here are a few tips for being an admin (some of which I noticed you're already doing).


 * Check recent edits and welcome all new users (even unregistered IPs). The easist way is by using Template:Welcome.
 * Occasionally look for problem reports. The easiest way is to add the problem reports widget to your sidebar. To do this, click the MORE button in the upper right. Then click Manage widgets, find Problem Reports and click the + or you can go to Special:ProblemReports.
 * Occasionally check Special:Uncategorizedpages and put any pages on the list into appropriate categories.
 * Take care of vandalism/spam and temporarily block (ban) the vandals.

If you have any questions at all about any of that, or need any help with something, don't hesitate to leave a message on my talk page. Congrats again! JoePlay (talk) 18:45, 8 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Thank you! I'll do my best. :) -- Tullis 16:59, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

New logo
Hey Tullis. I saw your request for a new logo, so I made one. Take a look:

The Monaco skin can now display a Wiki.png image of up to 216 pixels wide (to completely fill the logo area), but anyone using Monobook will only see the 135 pixels in the middle. That's why the text in the logo I just made is in the middle, so that anyone using Monobook will see what looks like a full logo and not something cut off at both sides. If you want me to make any changes to the logo, just say so, or if you want to use it as is, simply upload it as Wiki.png to replace the old logo.

The wiki is looking better than ever. When I first started working on this wiki back when it was only a few pages, I never would've guessed it would end up at over 900... and there's still two more ME games to be made! You are indeed a great admin. Keep it up! JoePlay (talk) 01:19, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for coming back so quickly! I do like the new logo: just seeing what others think before I upload it. And thanks for the support too. I still think we've got some of the best contributors on Wikia working here, which is why the wiki will hopefully continue to grow. : D --Tullis 01:23, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Video
Hey Tullis. I wanted to give you a heads up on a new project that we, the Wikia Gaming Team, are starting. I'm going to the top gaming wikis and adding relevant videos (from YouTube) to a few of the most popular/visited articles. We'll be tracking their usage to find out if it could be an extra enhancement to articles that people will use. If you have any questions, feedback, etc, feel free to drop me a message. JoePlay (talk) 01:07, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I personally have a lot of concerns regarding using in-game footage in articles, as it's a violation of copyright. I would really prefer that these videos weren't on here, but if it's Wikia policy... --Tullis 01:40, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Hey Tullis. I removed the remaining videos that I added yesterday. This is just an experiment that we're doing, and we expected that not every wiki would welcome the videos, so no worries. We totally respect the wishes of each wiki community. For the record, any YouTube video (that isn't deleted by YouTube) is fair use by us or any other website, so if there were any copyright issues, it would be them, not us, that would be in violation. JoePlay (talk) 21:00, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Hi Tullis. Since you are an admin of Mass Effect Wiki, I respect your decision on POSTING VIDEOS. But if we have to truly consider about Copyright Materials, we have to take in-game screen shots for our consideration also. Because according to my knowledge in-game screen shots are consider as Copyright Materials (At least in Wikipedia)--Snfonseka.
 * There's a difference between individual screenshots and posting entire in-game subplots (I refer to the Ashley conversations you linked to) which have been recorded from the game. That dilutes the experience and chases away possible Mass Effect players. Screenshots are designed to attract and illustrate. But if I am officially notified otherwise I'll take action. --Tullis 18:44, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Screenshot archive
In case you could make use of it, I created a zip file of every single screenshot from Mass Effect that I took--some 2,200, I believe. I used a program called IZArc to split the ZIP file into three parts so I could put it on RapidShare; I don't know if you'll need the same program to put it back into one archive. Here are the download links:

http://rapidshare.com/files/195821451/ME-Screenshot-Archive.z01 http://rapidshare.com/files/195846514/ME-Screenshot-Archive.z02 http://rapidshare.com/files/196175358/ME-Screenshot-Archive.zip

I apologize for all the gratuitous screenshots of my Shepards and my wife's Shepards. :) RobertM525 02:47, 10 February 2009 (UTC)


 * That is... a LOT of screenshots. I'll take a look through them, but if there's not something we can use out of 2,200 screenshots, I'd be utterly amazed. Thank you! --Tullis 02:53, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

If you're up to downloading all of it, simply putting all three files in the same place and attempting to open the last one may be sufficient to see them as one archive. On my system, it doesn't appear that they need to be "recombined" to work. FWIW. RobertM525 04:27, 11 February 2009 (UTC)


 * I've tried downloading all three and opening the last one, but still no dice. Must be a Mac thing... Boo. --Tullis 05:10, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Style Guide
I LOVE the style guide! The section on capitalization was EXACTLY what I was looking for. Great work!SpartHawg948 01:41, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks : ) It's mostly a merge from the old Manual of Style, but that was impossible to find... stupid search bar. I've now put links to both on the front page. --Tullis 01:45, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

New Recruit
Hello, Tullis. My name and rank is Captain Henry "Five Dog" Leyland, ma'am, but you can call me Five Dog. I have been recently transferred to this wiki from The Vault and from the Left 4 Dead wiki as part of my promotion to Captain. I have been taught editing skills on both of those wikis by my mentors. See below. I am here to aid in anyway I can, and if there is anything that needs doing please inform me and I'll see to it. I have yet to do virtually any real editing here.

Service Records:
 * Total Edits
 * Comm Link Frequency

Previous Superior Officers:
 * The Vault - Ausir
 * Left 4 Dead wiki - Stigma-231

Previous Mentors
 * The Vault - Porter21
 * Left 4 Dead wiki - Stigma-231

If you wish a recommendation or assurance of my ability to help, ask any one of the above. Please keep in mind, ma'am, that my superior officers may not remember me.

Mostly, this is my way of saying, "Hi, I'm here to help".


 * Look forward to future co-operation, Tullis.
 * Five Dog ( Talk ){ Updates } 23:11, 9 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Thank you. Check out these pages if you need our community guidelines or MEWiki-specific style information. And welcome! : ) --Tullis 23:37, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

New Info
$$Insert formula here$$

Tulis, I just saw this on G4tv.com/thefeed, and I thought you might be interested in it..... http://g4tv.com/thefeed/blog/post/696741/Mass-Effect-DLC-News-Coming-This-Week.html

Suggestions, differentiating the games and content in the series
I've noticed that this wiki seems to have been built primarily around one thing: the first Mass Effect game. No issue with that since nothing else could have happened, but since more games and novels and so on are finally beginning to crop up, now might be the time to prepare for these newcomers. The following are only suggestions to organize everything, and it would be unreasonable to expect them to be carried out at all given that people have lives outside of the wiki (unfunded mandate, so to speak), so take them as you will.


 * I've edited the Fallout Wiki, and one thing I've seen a few things used there which might also be beneficial here. First off, there are a lot of games in the Fallout universe. To help identify which games a particular article refers to, there are icons in the upper right-hand corner of each article which indicate in what game milieu the subject belongs.
 * Example 1: This article about DLC. Since the subject involves Fallout 3 DLC, as well as each DLC installment, the icons for the main game and the DLC are displayed.
 * Example 2: This article about a group of NPCs/enemies. The group appears in multiple games, so the appropriate icons are used.
 * Example 3: This article about one of Fallout 3's main characters. The character is important primarily to the main game's storyline, so only the icon for that game is used.
 * Applying the use of icons to this wiki, take the article about assault rifles. They are important to the gameplay of Mass Effect and presumably Mass Effect 2, so the article would have the two icons designating that the items appear in both games. Where things get confusing is the Bring Down the Sky DLC, or any DLC or novel/non-game. The DLC itself is not a game, so even though assault rifles are used there, the DLC icon should not be added to the article. In contrast, a new character who appeared in the DLC would need the DLC icon. Icons should be used to identify items/characters/concepts/locations that are essential or were introduced in a particular game, add-on, or novel. Anyone reading this probably knows what I mean, so forgive me if I over-explain things (to death).


 * I recently noticed the absence of a reference template on this wiki. It could probably be copied from Wikipedia's example, and the citation templates there might also need to be copied. There may not be any organized attempt at sourcing everything here since the game is source enough, but it couldn't hurt to try using proper references and citations.


 * Lastly, this is less an applicable feature than a reminder or a highlight of a potential issue. Kudos to whoever redesigned the main page here, it's an improvement. However, the new layout emphasizes only the first Mass Effect game and its content. Granted, next to nothing is known about Mass Effect 2 or Mass Effect Galaxy, but contingencies should be in place (if they aren't already) to evenly promote the content of all of the games. As best as I can explain it, I'd hope that Mass Effect 2 and Galaxy gets their own dedicated walkthrough, assignments, and characters pages; combining stuff like that all into single articles that cover every game would simply be confusing. If ME2 does eventually get its own walkthrough and so forth, there would need to be more buttons on the main page to link to those. This was probably obvious to editors here, but setting things down on (virtual) paper can't hurt.

That should be about it. There might already have been plans in place to take care of some this stuff, there might not. In any case, these are just a few ideas I would like this wiki to keep in mind or implement if possible. Admittedly, I could possibly do them myself with the blessing of the head honcho 'round these parts, but I don't have the know-how; I stay away from anything that requires delicate syntax and only edit simple things (take the icons; I have no idea how they are made to appear above the articles). I cannot and would not force anyone else to do this stuff, so it's completely understandable if nothing happens. Nevertheless, here are the suggestions, plain for anyone to see and in no sense detrimental to the system. I leave it to you to do (or do not) as is seen fit. 74.215.114.200 19:01, 21 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Welcome to the wiki, and thanks for sharing your ideas.
 * Yup, things are going to get complex once Mass Effect 2 comes out. Thankfully we have a lot of templates for planets, things like that, which should help us cope. I'm not sure icons at the top right will be that useful, though. I'm not disparaging them on the Fallout wiki, they're just not particularly noticeable if you're not used to them, and too large and they become a nuisance. It's definitely something to consider, though, as the teeny ME2 icon is noticeable but not intrusive. And I'd restrict it to characters and locations. Something like assault rifles... yeah, to be honest, I wouldn't bother designating those between games.
 * We do use references, just not very often. Normally we just stick a source heading at the bottom of articles. Some of the ME: Ascension pages have references on them, though.
 * For Mass Effect Galaxy and ME2 -- they will definitely have their own walkthroughs, and it's likely the existing Walkthrough page will be converted into a disambig page to link to all three. I've recently done a slash-and-burn on the Characters page, and it should accommodate the main characters (note MAIN characters) of the games with Category:Characters giving an alphabetical list for the curious. Otherwise, and this might be smarter, we can easily do the same with those pages as for the walkthroughs: branch them off from a single page, so people can just go to "assignments" and then to "Mass Effect 2 assignments" or whatever they wish.
 * What will probably happen is this: a deluge of information that will gradually get sifted around. We also have statistics to track what the most looked-at pages are (that's how JoePlay, who redesigned the front page, picked which articles to use as buttons). That should help us work out where people want to go, and how to get them there most effectively. But thank you very much, and I'll certainly keep your suggestions handy. --Tullis 19:20, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Actually, if it's all right with you, I may split this enormous discussion to my talk page. As it says at the top, this page is to discuss the main page and this is getting into hardcore wiki refiling territory. : ) --Tullis 19:23, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Feel free to split away. I didn't think my suggestions would get looked at so quickly, I posted them here because I didn't know where else would be appropriate. I mainly suggested all this because I'm an obsessive organizer, and I usually try to organize things I'm interested in like the ME games (sci-fi rules!). I've begun moving away from the Fallout Wiki, taking a break from the game and such, so I may end up being more active here as we get closer to ME2. 74.215.114.200 23:30, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * There we go, I've established my account here. I won't be online much over the next few days since I'll be occupied with another game I'm about to buy. When I'm back though, I'll see if I can start helping out. -- Commdor (Talk) 23:40, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Races page
I gotta say, I just looked at the races page for the first time in a while, and it's quite possibly the most awesome page ever. Just thought I'd mention that. SpartHawg948 05:08, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you. --Tullis 12:31, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

How do you become a featured user?
I was just curious as to how you can be further recognized with your name on the featured user page.--Brandon M. Lisi 22:42, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Being a "featured user" just recognises that you've been on the wiki for a long time and made a lot of edits. It's not possible to "make" someone a featured user; you become such after being a long-term member and contributor. --Tullis 22:48, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

New Quote for Commander Shepard Article
Dear Tullis,

After reviewing a few articles, I noticed that each main character has a quote on its article. Most of these quotes are certainly appropriate for the character they represent. However, Commander Shepard's quote is: "you're not even alive, you're just a machine and machines can be broken." Likewise, I don't see how this represents the character of Shepard. A few ideas I have are: "I'd rather die fighting than live as a slave." The only reason why I bring this up is because it has been confirmed in the Mass Effect2 "Prelude to E3 video" that players in Mass Effect 2 will decide whether or not synthetics such as Geth, Husks, and Reapers are truly "alive." If this is true, then the quote should be changed. However, with Mass Effect 2 coming out within the next 6 months, I'm sure we'll have plenty of "quote worthy" material to work with. Also, lets try to get a quote for all of the characters, and not just the main ones. --Brandon M. Lisi 15:13, 17 August 2009 (UTC)


 * We used to have quotes for every character and it ends up looking very messy. Besides, when you get into characters like Hana Murakami or May O'Connell, they don't really say enough that's memorable to justify it. We generally keep quotes, like infoboxes, for the "poster" characters (the ones that appear on the ME poster) to show their importance.
 * The reason I chose that quote for Shepard is this: I believe it's the common response when talking to Sovereign's hologram, and I wanted a quote that didn't depend on you being a Paragon or a Renegade. The idea was to keep in the spirit of not using Shepard pictures on the wiki. I wanted something every Shepard would be likely to say so people wouldn't think: "But my Shepard wouldn't say that." That sentiment also encapsulates Mass Effect's attitude toward artificial intelligence as a whole, and Shepard's enemies are mostly synthetic. I understand where you're coming from, though.
 * Also, please don't put ME2 info, however small, on my Talk page; I'm trying to avoid spoilers and it's proving quite a trial. : ) --Tullis 15:31, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Just Asking...
Hey, I've notice there's a page on the Rachni War and the First Contact War and I was just asking if it was ok if you guys put a Infobox War Box like the ones on Halopedia or any other wiki that has a page on war. You know just asking. You know like Infobox Military Conflict with these: for example. -Matt xMan 07:05, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Nope, we don't use infoboxes for conflicts. The few conflicts that have been in Mass Effect don't really have enough details for them (for example, we don't have exact dates for the beginning and end of the Rachni Wars, any idea of casualties, notable battlefields or combatants, etc.). Halopedia is a different case because they a) have a lot more conflicts to deal with which are turning points, and b) a better idea of details (I'd imagine).
 * To be honest, I like to be as sparing as possible with infoboxes. It feels odd to reduce complex characters, situations, conflicts and ideas to entries in a box when they deserve to be explained properly in-article. And because we don't have unique articles for, say, liberating Eden Prime or the assault on Virmire or the siege of the Citadel (as these are covered in their mission articles or the walkthrough) there's currently not a place for them. But if infoboxes for wars become necessary in the future, we'll see what can be done. --Tullis 13:00, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Saving Private Liara
I originally posted on the Morality Guide that saving Liara on Therum would Grant +8 Paragon because I noticed a visible jump in my paragon bar, but my next playthrough the jump was not there, so I thought about posting it as a "First Playthrough Only" Award, but on my 3rd playthrough on the same character, the noticeable change post-Therum wass back, Now on a new character first playthrough, the increase is gone. And yes I've checked the totals vs excel spreadsheet tracking I have to make sure I was not imagining things, on some playthroughs the bonus -is- there, on some it -is not- there, needless to say the discrepancy is driving mje bonkers Sonevar 14:08, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Stupid question, but are you using the same dialogue options each time when speaking to her and the Council? --Tullis 14:10, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes Same dialogue options during rescue, cause for some reason, choosing to kill her wouldbe captors immediately forfeits a large chunk of xp and durring the debrief/council report I always use upper dialogue or when possible investigation choices, I know the numbers are there on several playthroughs because my excel tracking totals match, whereas on others... Sonevar 14:33, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
 * My only explanation is that it would be something to do with your level, but seeing as I'm the world's biggest ignoramus when it comes to maths, it's more than likely I'm entirely wrong. And that doesn't explain why you get a Paragon jump at some times and not others, either. --Tullis 14:39, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Maybe it's a bug, or maybe I really am seeing things, whichever the case, I removed it from the morality guide as, even if it is there, I can't find a reliable way to trigger it. The infuriatingly sad part is I finally found a way to juggle certain assignments to allow for more points on first playthrough since a couple require 4 Charm/Intim you can get the points if you save them for late in the game, but without the "Liara Points" even with Earthborn Background, I come up 3 points shy of unlocking both Morality Quests on First Playthrough. Sonevar 01:23, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Carying Files...
I've been thinking. Well, I know that ME 2 will cary over the files from the last one but what if it doesn't get it all right. I think it might be obvious they'll mention alot of the important stuff from the last but well... Lets say for example you let the Councle die in the last game and the next one they're still living. You get what I'm saying, right? Basicly I'm saying is that what if the files might screw things up?-Matt xMan 04:15, 22 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Most likely, when starting a new game in ME2, you will be asked if you want to import/use your profile from ME. In any case, you will be notified if there is any problem with the importing of the ME profile, and I doubt they developers will make such a mistake (i.e. you cannot choose to use Wrex, Ashley, or Garrus if they are not in your team - although its still in the same game scope, the principle is the same). --silverstrike 11:14, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Mass Effect Forums
There are currently three forums on the wiki, and although they don't get much traffic, I still check them out once in a while. The problem is that there is no ME2 forum, what causes topics in about ME2 to appear in the other forums - I saw just one, but still I prefer not to encounter spoilers for ME2. --silverstrike 10:53, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Short pages
To continue our discussion from Talk:Nodacrux, I started a list of the "too short" pages:


 * NB: Highlighting for approving merge is still in progress due to time restrictions! --Tullis 15:52, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

This table might have pages that need to stand on their on, but from brief check, they all have two to three short paragraphs - so I'll let you strike out those that need to stand on their own... --silverstrike 15:46, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Some of these are already candidates for merge, especially the naval ones etc, and some are candidates for expansion. For example some of these pages from ME:Galaxy are short because they haven't been expanded yet. But we can't just tag them for merge, we also need to think where we're going to merge them to. --Tullis 15:52, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I think that Hahne-Kedar Shadow Works could be merged into Hahne-Kedar as a foot note, and Galactic Codex: Essentials Edition 2183 could be merged with Mass Effect Limited Collector's Edition. But I do agree with your note about Mass Effect Galaxy, I should not of tagged them.
 * There are also some pages that describes the Alliance ships, personal, or operation that can be merged to one page that contain miscellaneous information about the alliance. --silverstrike 16:02, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah. I really don't want to start just having pages for "misc information on X". That's going to make linking to that information, deciding what goes into it and constantly informing new editors a MASSIVE headache for both the admins and new users. I'd prefer several short pages to that. --Tullis 16:09, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I get what your saying, but currently that information is not very accessible. Even if we don't have "Misceleneous information about the alliance", but instead "Alliance vessels", and listing all the SSV whatever there, then we still have organization, without complicating the matter too much. --silverstrike 16:23, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
 * That's why I've been meaning to get around to overhauling Alliance Navy. Unfortunately I haven't had time to reorganise it. I do my best, but my job keeps me very busy and sometimes I don't have time to do everything. : ) --Tullis 16:25, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I'll be happy to pitch in, just tell me what can I do to help... --silverstrike 16:32, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Just throwing in my two cents: Merging a lot of these articles is a great idea, but some articles (Leviathan of Dis and Matriarch Dilinaga come to mind, do not really lend themselves to merging. It might be good to come up with a list of articles that can't really be merged, and then the rest should (hopefully) fall into place. SpartHawg948 06:52, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
 * True. Though I wouldn't be too perturbed to see Dilinaga's information in UNC: Asari Writings or something, but I certainly get the point. We may need to just accept that there are gonna be short pages here and there, and do our best to cut down on 'em. : ) --Tullis 12:06, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Alliance Navy
What I want to do for this is to have all the short navy articles -- Fifth Fleet, Second Fleet, the scout flotilla, Kastanie Drescher -- merged onto one page under various headings. We can then turn those articles into redirects. --Tullis 16:34, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I have updated the Alliance Navy page to include all the information from the relevant pages - the page needs more styling and cleaning up, but first I need to know if that's the direction you want to go, or do you want the expansion on another page. Will also update the relevant pages with redirects shortly. --silverstrike 19:49, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
 * That definitely looks like the way to go, though we'll need to shuffle information around a bit. Nice job, thank you very much. : ) --Tullis 19:56, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Glad I could help :).
 * I have updated the relevant pages with redirects, and now will try to organize the information to be more clear. There is also the mention of Known Vessels which we could do the same with, although it's quite a long list. --silverstrike 20:11, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I just went through Codex/Humanity and the Systems Alliance page, and there is allot of information there that can be used on the Alliance Navy page - my question is, do I try to use that information (summarize it to a paragraph or two) on the Alliance Navy page, or should I leave it alone and just concentrate on what I merged? --silverstrike 20:51, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Better then halopedia
Hello,

You might remember me from someone hacking and making vulgar edits. Anyay I just wanted to say that personaly this is this bets game wiki ever. Halopedia adds a lot of speculation to there edits and also..the head admin treats people like they are nothing..and he tell them that as well. Mass effect introduces a new feel to gameplay. The feeling is hard to ecplain but it is for sure a game all on its own..Im making
 * That's very kind. Thanks, and good to see you again (sans hacker problems : ) ). --Tullis 00:06, 30 August 2009 (UTC)