Forum:Blog Moderation II

I'm re-proposing the blog moderation policy. I am not satisfied that the previous proposal was given a fair chance. Silverstrike initially proposed the policy without any specific terms, which caused several users, including myself, to either vote neutral or against the policy until such time as it could be clarified. After the proposal was properly outlined, however, only two of those who voted neutrally or against changed their vote. The other neutral-voting users did not return to reevaluate the policy, and I believe that it would have passed if they had. This time, the policy (unchanged from the previous proposal) is defined from the start. If it fails again, it will be because the community truly rejects it, not because of a hitch in how it was presented. -- Commdor (Talk) 16:59, May 7, 2012 (UTC)

Blog Moderation Policy

 * 1) Any contributor can notify an admin or senior editor when encountering an inappropriate post or comment. If two or more admins or senior editors agree with the contributor claim, an admin can either alert the poster that the post or comment is inappropriate and allow the poster to edit the post, or delete it outright based on that admin's judgement of the post.
 * 2) Espousing violent action against a real-life person or organization, inciting against them, or directing offensive language against them in blogs or blog comments is prohibited. Blogs or blog comments in violation of this can be deleted on sight.
 * 3) Additionally, if a blog or blog comment is found in violation of any other wiki policy regardless of there being a user complaint against it, it can be deleted without admins' and senior editors' agreement.
 * 4) In each case the poster will be notified of the deletion and the reasoning behind it.

Support

 * 1) As proposer. -- Commdor (Talk) 16:59, May 7, 2012 (UTC)