User blog comment:-Algol-/Of policies, admins and the community/@comment-1958269-20130204021636/@comment-217683-20130204092003

Basically, the long and short of it is - Commdor saw the policy and, as did most (if not all) who saw it and commented, took it to be a joke, one in rather poor taste. As such, he favored deleting it. He emailed me and Lancer, asking for our input. He pointed out that, as this was a "proposal" solely affecting (effecting? Always mix those two up...) the admins, it seemed reasonable for the admins to put the kibosh on it, since it seemed like a joke. I said that, given the circumstances and the sketchy nature of the anon, I was cool with closing the vote and deleting it. I assume Lancer concurred, because the policy proposal has since been deleted. That's about all there is to tell. The proposal didn't seem serious, the user (as you point out) was of questionable legitimacy, and the admins wouldn't have felt comfortable implementing the policy if passed. Hope that answers your questions. If not, please let me know, preferably on the talk page, since I don't often check this blog. As it is, I only saw your comment because I saw Dammej had contributed and figured I'd sneak a peek at what he had to say, then I saw your "I'd still like an admin to comment." and figured I'd oblige. :)