User blog comment:Ratiu Grigore/Star wars vs.mass effect/@comment-4310467-20111112173821/@comment-1900300-20111113083427

And there was two Death Stars, the Death Star prototype, the World Devastators, the Sun Crusher (Which could destroy freaking SOLAR SYSTEMS), the Galaxy Gun, the Super Star Destroyers Knight Hammer, Executor, Eclipse, the Iron Fist and the Lusankya. And that does not include past and future superweapons such as the Mass Shadow Generator or the planet destroying technology of the Yuushan Vong.

Then you have the Force, which grants Jedi ground forces an advantage against Mass Effect ground forces. Unlike botics who are limited to moving objects in powerful but inpersis body movements, Jedi and Sith can read and influence the emotions and minds of both opponents and eniemies, allowing better squad tacics while interfereing with the enemies ablity to remain clear.

If there are any issues i see it is that Mass Effect weapons utilies tiny metal projectiles that i would assume lightsabers cant deflect. Im sure a lightsaber could completely vaporise such a tiny fragment but the rate of fire and small size begs the question of their effectiveness on the ground. Jedi have limits on what they are capable to handling as RotS has shown us. Then you have the Mass Effect advantage of personal shielding, as in Star Wars this technology is hardly used by organics due to radiation problems.