User blog comment:Legionwrex/Spectre vs Spartan II/@comment-1886172-20101227171020/@comment-217683-20101227185532

Stronger? Maybe. (It's case by case) More agile? No. We know that there are at least some Spectres faster and more agile than Spartan IIs. (Example - Tela Vasir). Better weapons? Don't make me laugh! When the Spartan runs out of ammo, the Spectre can keep right on shooting. More experience? Says who? That's about as subjective as you can possibly get. Not all Spartans have the same level of experience, ditto for Spectres. Basing it off of experience is like basing it off of physical attractiveness. It's way too subjective. Better HUD? When does that ever decide the outcome? Ever? In the history of warfare, when has the better HUD ever been a decisive factor? Answer - NEVER. AI "strongly increases their ability to fight"? Please! How many Spartan IIs have we seen with these AIs? A very, very, very, very small minority. Motion tracker? Whoopty-do! See my argument for the HUD.

Sorry pal, we don't "all know a SPARTAN-II could easily kill a Spectre". That's one of the most opinionated, speculative, BS statements I've seen in a while. I'm still betting on the Spectre. Guess that pretty much disproves the first bit of your comment...