User blog comment:Suparockr/List of Plotholes throughout the series/@comment-5503561-20120718012533/@comment-3325589-20120718072722

"Polls on the internet are so reliable. That's how sixty-some thousand people tried to get people to think that they represented a majority of over 1.5 million people. XD"

Well there goes all of sociology...

I'm generally in agreement that the "when anything goes at all wrong, blame EA" line of thought is tired and annoying, but this claim seems to overlook basic statistics. There's no reason that 60,000 people can't be a representative sample of 1.5 million. Do we have reason to believe that the voters on the Consumerist had a disproportionate and unrepresentative beef with EA?