User blog comment:The Milkman/Indoctrination: You're Doing It Wrong/@comment-1958269-20120620191345/@comment-166.82.245.89-20120620230758

While I agree that this isn't something to get upset to the point of suing over it, and I know Americans get sue-happy to the point of ridiculousness, I think its less of a popsicle with two sticks stuck together and closer to a company like McDonalds advertising some burgers made with ground meat coming exclusively from the tenderloin, explicitly stating that beef tenderloin was the only meat used, and then you buy it, and then you find out part of it tastes like fish, not what you paid for, and since it was supposedly tenderloin, you paid a premium price for it, later you find out its only say, 10% tenderloin,  I don't know about you but I would be rather ticked off. And I would at least try to notify somebody that they advertised falsely, still a far off analogy but I think its better than the popsicle argument, where you got what you paid for.

And come on, $60 is a rather premium price to pay for something you didn't get.