User blog comment:The Milkman/No Love For Leviathan?/@comment-24174486-20120915231103/@comment-2228120-20120916143415

"So it would have been better if the series simply left the entire reason for the Reapers' cycles in the dark? Ignoring the build-up from Harbinger's dialogue throughout ME2"

What build-up? All we ever learned from Harbinger was the ascension BS, which was related to the construction of the human Reaper, not to s. x o.

"Human Reaper"

Was actually pretty much foreshadowed by the Harbinger's dialogue which you have just mentioned yourself, and tied to the concept of thousands of humans abducted for an unknown reason. Show me corresponding concepts in ME3 which indicate the synthetics x organics conflict.

"Exactly—it's not the "MAIN conflict". The main conflict is what you were trying to do for the entirety of the game: stop the Reapers. Considering how only one choice actually addresses the Catalyst's problem—not that there are no other reasons for choosing Synthesis—and all of the choices address the Reapers, it's painfully obvious what problem you're primarily trying to resolve in the ending." Did you actually bother to read that rather prolonged response I wrote you under my blog concerning this? In every single ending option, the Catalyst is trying to adress its goal in some way, more or less efficient, including the Destroy.