User blog comment:Nintendogeek01/Regarding the ending... SHUT... UP.../@comment-2228120-20120531131750

"You should be grateful BioWare cares enough to listen to your complaints and give you something that won't cost you more than time" Pardon? Whenever I buy a flawed product for my flawless coin, I expect the producer to fix the flaw free of cost. I do realize that a game story is not the same as a broken toaster, but I don't see why I should be humbly grateful for something that is in the company's own interest to provide to keep their customer base satisfied. Besides, I believe that the deus ex machina part does not relate so much to the unpredictable action of the Crucible but to the Catalyst itself. If I didn't miss anything, there was ONE mention, somewher towards the end of the game, that the Reapers may be controlled by something, and this is entirely insufficient. The same for the supposed organic-synthetic conflict: it was established as early as ME1, with that AI stealing money from the casino, only to be continuously undermined throughout the series as we gradually come to know Legion and EDI, learn the truth about the Morning War, make piece between the geth and the quarians - and then it's all just thrown in our faces because some blue brat says so. How is this not a deus ex machinawhen the inevitability of the organic-synthetic conflict is not only not foreshadowed but outright disputed?