User blog comment:StagedDom19/Missing the Main Problem/@comment-5008642-20120712005513/@comment-5274392-20120713182556

Okay, my arguements about the replacements for the central characters if they are dead is showing that there is relitively no difference between the renegade or Paragon paths. If Wreav is the leader of the Krogan, it never tells you what he'll do after the events of ME3, it's all speculation and we can't say for sure he'd lead another Krogan rebellion.

The rachni Queen. Listen, as I've said five times already, if you change your alignment, it's your own fault that you get punished by it. Your argument is as flawed as the basis for having a second queen at all in ME3 if you already killed it.

As for the genophage, again, the difference here is about 50 EMS, the outcome is the same: the Krogan support you. You still get them to help you in the war. If Pak Wiks had second thoughts aferward and told Wreav, then having Mordin alive would have been relevant.

I already have admitted I was wrong about the Collector Base.

As for the endings, after all that's been said over them, I really don't feel like arguing them when they've already ready been debated enough throughout the fandom.

Your comparison between Wrex and Wreav is still flawed, because changing your alignment is your own fault. You still get the Krogan if you follow the character's personality you created. But if you want someone as important as Shepard to go through such a different personality switch than that's on you. I don't even understand where you're trying to go with the second to last paragraph, and I don't deal in falsehoods such as what the last paragraph is.

Finally, arguing this is pointless, none of us are going to change the opinions of the other.