User blog comment:Commdor/Pre-order bonuses for ME3 revealed/@comment-76.99.54.162-20120103071959/@comment-737801-20120103082634

Except you were trying to twist the fact into your favor. You assumed that because I did not allow your information, that I was picking which information should be included. Since your information was not valid, then the stuff we have already must not be as well. This is what your words are saying as they are written. Your words in several of your comments are quite explicit and give little variance to what they could mean. However, you again assume, incorrectly, that I did, what you did. I did not make biased interpretations, I took your words at face value, and your words in a few cases, again left little room for interpretation, but the ones that did, I responded to what the words on the page said, not how I interpreted them. If I had, then they would have been very different. You interpreted my words to say something they did, you made false accusations, and that is what the words on the page say, not what I interpreted them to be. Again, I have misinterpreted things before, and make the best effort not to, so the words at face value is what I deal with. I do not respond based on interpretation of things, as I have learned that more often than not, leads to disastrous results. Yet, when someone else does it, then that leads to a situation like we have here. And I didn’t ignore you, I actually responded, yet you seemed to have glossed over it.

And again you are incorrect. People in positions of authority can say literally anything. Yet it is up to the person hearing or reading those words to interpret how they understand and process it, and then act on that. One physically cannot phase everything so that it cannot be misinterpreted without taking hours to respond to something, or being so vague that nothing gets accomplished. This is a two-way street, despite what you believe. Again, people can take a simple phrase as a threat, or take a simple request as someone being overly harsh, when again, more often than not, that isn’t the case. It is up to the person reading to not make assumptions and read/listen without bias, because again a simple phrase can be misinterpreted. It is a two-way street, and your refusal to meet someone half way on text-based communication, tells me something. It is 50-50, again, and I don’t understand how, despite what you seem to incorrectly believe.