User blog comment:Kaloneous/Mass Effect 3 Ending DLC Denied and PAX/@comment-4043223-20120323231035/@comment-1841436-20120325145505

That may be possible, but that message was taken mid way through the game and during that time the Reapers could have moved to the farmlands as well. Possible, but gave no indication of this.

Earth is over populated Not anymore.

but their would still be a number of billion. Possibly. Still far less than we have even today.

Include into that the asari, salarian, batarian, elcor and krogan forces which number in the millions at least. With a standard turian cruiser holding only 50 troops, and considering how many forces youa ctually bring with you, and the localised nature of the ground fighting (it being in London) I'd say far, far less. Maybe a couple hundred thousand. Also having dimnished numbers.

''And what if you cured the genophage and the krogans on Earth multiple at a rate that far exceeds their resources. '' They would either have to havethat social change Wrex had beent alking about for three games, and Eve for one, or yeah, there would be problems.

The quarians grow their food but that food cannot support their 17 million population and the turian population forever. Well it's a good thing they didn't BRING all 17 million, isn't it?

''They need fertilizer for the soil, seeds for the plants etc the process is simply not self-sustaining. '' They grow the food on the live ships... which means seeds. As for fertiliser, we don't even know if all they need is concrete for their plants to flourish.

Either way there is no indication they gave the matter serious consideration or study or even they had the capablity in the first place. It was a minor implication in the first place. Just an open possibility for what might happen.

''asari are not as militarily and scientifically advanced as they should have been, as even the Protheans thought they would be. '' Two seperate cultures need not ensesarilly develop along the exact same lines when if comes to technological elvel. For example, a culture could deveop computers before gunpowder. But this is moot.

''The Protheans were at their peak, far beyond anything the asari have, when they made the Conduit. '' They were also stagnant in their innovation. The Asari are not.

Whether they have the technical means resources etc to enact a plan is very much speculation. Not aguing against this.

The distances of space would dictate such a plan would take generations, if they have that long. Tey live for 1000 years, so yes.

''Do they have the fuel to do so? Do they have the ezzo to power the relay?'' Maybe? It's entirely obtainable if not. These are Asari, Thessia alone has the reserves.

How do they move the relay? By towing it? It can be akin to the secondary relays, smaller. Or hell, their own design.

''Do they have many ships tow it, cause that would take even more fuel and food. '' Never said it wouldn't be hard.

Again, do they have the technical capabilities to advance FTL? The humans did. Tantalus.

Even the Reapers could not advance beyond the speeds of FTL. We're better than the reapers. FTL means faster than light. That is not a set speed. Simply a minimum speed.

This is a scientific endeavor that aliens have had thousands of years to study, Now they ahve longer

The salarians couldn’t find a way, and by their very nature they push the limits of everything. Again, tantalus. That increased the maximum FTL for a ship of that size.

As it stands FTL, even for the Reapers, is limited to being able to move from one system to the next in a span of several months to years. Yep. This is correct.A s it stands. Though this si all possibilities for the future, the distant future and such can hardly be considered to have any relation to a percieved problem with the plot.

ignoring our points,  For all intents and purposes I'm copying and pasting whole comments.

taking them way out of proportion, Yeah, I blew up. After that first "debate" frustration and anger took over.

''coming up with obscure ways to argue what we're saying about the ending. '' What's obscure about them? Does something need clairification?

He makes some snarky comment about our explanations, using what he thinks is proof to back it up. Oh, I would love an example of how I failed to provide an explanation. After the frustration, not during.

he goes off his previous point and trashes something I said in my comment that cannot be so easily refutable. When did I do this? If anything this is precicely what YOU'RE doing. instead of adressing anything I said, you simply say "nope,c an't happen" and say I'm not addressing what you siad. despite my having copied and pasted nearly your whole comment.... This is why I ave up last time, this is why I blew up. This is why I accuse people of ignoring what i say. Because they are.

I would like to lodge a formal complaint about this, Since I'm not doing any of this, go right ahead.