User blog comment:-Algol-/Of policies, admins and the community/@comment-4319257-20130131213243

Here is an answer why a re-vote wasn't done (yet):

The admins felt that, given the clear-cut voter canvassing, a fair and impartial vote was impossible

Now how do you like that? Gotta ask you a question: do you really consider three people passing the policy, while suggesting it in the first place, FAIR AND IMPARTIAL?

Are you still surprised about "draconian policies" accusations?

Why do you even bother with voting anyways?