User blog comment:Mr. Mittens/Why It Had To Happen/@comment-217683-20130228105434

Oy Vey... for the umpteenth time... the admins did exactly what you and the nineteen voters wanted. The vote was, in your own words, a formal request to hold a new vote. ("Therefore, I propose that the administration holds a new vote regarding the policy in question") At no point did you state that the vote must be initiated by me specifically or by any other administrator in general. The admins discussed the matter after the vote passed and, due in large part to the overwhelming passage of the vote, agreed to a revote. At that point, the stated purpose of the vote was accomplished.

I also went a step further, laying out in detail what did and didn't need to be done. But, for some reason, you continue to insist that I personally was supposed to start the revote. This despite the clear evidence to the contrary. I mean, I get that you need a justification, however flimsy. But I'm not buying it, nor is the community, which voted down your demotion proposal by an even greater margin than they voted for your revote proposal.