User blog comment:Legionwrex/Shepard vs Samus/@comment-86.23.74.224-20110517231723/@comment-86.31.163.33-20110519200007

Its not that I don't appreciate your mediation, I do, but it is unneccessary. Why can't I make a simple hypothesis of who would win? Reason dictates to me from fair comparison that Samus would win. I don't need statistics, just play any of the games, you will see that Samus inhabits a parallel universe with tech the Reapers could only dream of. Your escalation argument is also made redundant by this fact. Technology is completely different depending on the race, time, place and circumstances in which it was created; even in fiction. Shepard will never have encountered an enemy quite like Samus, they exist in different eras in different universes. A fair judgement CAN be reached if (hypothetically) they did meet and fight. Trying to involve non-existent, tangible proof is the same naturalistic fallacy of refusing to aknowledge that there is an argument for intelligent design. There is an argument here, and I am going to resolve it!