User blog:Patstriker25/Being of light Vs Indoctrination

First of the notion that the godchild at the end of mass effect 3 is a being of light is nothing rubbish to me, though everybody is entitled to their opinions. I saw evidence with my own eyes in the refusal ending where his voice changed to harbingers saying so be it! then completely disappearing, indicating to me that the godchild was actually Harbinger! not a being of light! I mean the being of light theory to me is an interesting theory but I stand by my belief in the indoctrination theory. the fact is the Destroy ending is the only ending that has the possibility of that breath scene. First off there is metallic items on earth, so who is to say that shepard was not on earth. Second, in reality there is no way Commander Shepard's Pistol would have had unlimited ammunition, which is another reason I believe the being of light theory is false. third, if the illusive man were really real in that event sequence would he not have tried to take control of the reapers and use the console himself after he killed you and Anderson? here is what I think: Anderson represents the part of shepard that is resisting the indoctrination, The Illusive man represents the part of shepard that is indoctrinated. another thing that should be noted shepard bleeds from the exact spot from where he shoots Anderson(shown in the indoctrination theory video) a great indication of what I mean.