User blog comment:Crazywarfire/Indoctrination Theory is BS/@comment-118213-20120612184334

The issue I notice is that the answers you are attempting to provide do not address the full questions regarding the inconsistent and conflicting ending of Mass Effect 3. To allot people have consistent, not to mention coherent, responses for them. Lets examine at a couple of examples:


 * "If Shepard isn't dead, why did Harbringer fly away?: Probably assumed Shepard was killed with the others."
 * So he probably assumed this? That's no response.
 * "Why does your handgun have unlimited ammo?: The question that annoys me the most. It can be answered by simple gameplay mechanics. Would you like to have a Canifex with an 8 round Mag with limited ammo killing three husk and a marauder?"
 * That's not an explanation. Ammo is an integral part of gameplay in ME2 and ME3, you run out of ammo you loose your ability to fight.

To be honest, I've seen better arguments against the Indoctrination Theory, I use arguments lightly as your post hardly constitutes an argument. As others have said, I find it very difficult to believe your a writer,