User blog comment:Legionwrex/Why Destroy is the worst ending (besides refusal)./@comment-4967682-20130313095307

That's thing though... there is no synthetic vs organic problem. That was just what the crazy hologram said. I don't agree with its logic, and picking Destroy is the best way to say "shut up". Now the galaxy is free to make their own way, and not completely botch how they make their appliances.

Also, I hate the geth and don't mind that they die. At all. Them dying is a good part of Destroy, for me. EDI... I don't hate it, but it's an acceptable sacrifice to completely ensure the destruction of the Reapers.

Shepard is explicitly Shepard. His mind is not a VI.

Synthesis and Control are just absolutely insane to me, and require Shepard temporarily forgetting the past 100 hours of the games and becoming a power-hungry psychopath who thinks that he has the right to determine the fate of the galaxy. Also, it requires him to be EXTREMELY gullible by killing himself because the Reapers told him to. Also also, the Reapers are kept around in both endings. THE PROBLEM HASN'T BEEN SOLVED. IN ONE, YOU JUST HAVE THE WORD OF THE CATALYST THAT THEY WON'T GO REAPING AGAIN, and in the other, there's appropximately a 100% chance that Shepard will go insane from being isolated as a Reaper mind for millions of years. I just don't trust either Machine God.

Lastly: Destroy is space magic, so it only destroys the geth and EDI. Everything else is fine for some reason, or at least no worse off than any other ending. So no need to worry about people with cybernetics.