Forum:Am i the only one that thinks that organics need to change?

i would go as far as to say that i side with the catalyst/reapers but after the extended cut when i really thought about it, this whole mess is the result of something stupid an organic did. some organic race created the catalyst with apparently no restrictions.

another thing i noticed that had nothing to do with the extended cut was that every major conflict in the series involves only organics, or was started by organics. the first contact war was turians and humans. the rachni wars were between council races and the rachni. the krogans helped with that and then in return they got the genophage and a bomb on their planet. but the krogan rebellions show that they were getting out of control. we learn from javik that the protheans were basically just bullies that shunned or killed those that wouldnt join them. this entire cycle is the result of an organic race making a bad decision.

the only time in the entire series that a synthetic life form was hostile towards an organic life form was in self defense or because it didnt want to be enslaved... by organics. even that money funneling AI on the citadel in the first game was questioning its existence and merely wanted to make contact with its own kind. the quarians started the geth wars out of fear.

i think the real conflict isnt as simple as organics vs synthetics. its organics creating artificial life and then trying to destroy it out of fear. organics by nature are paranoid and fundamentally insane. we let the most ridiculous things dictate our decision making and behavior. much of this results in situations like i mentioned above.

i think that synthesis is a necessary change or we will continue down this paranoid and destructive path and we will eventually be responsible for our own demise. im not so sure that forcing it on the galaxy like synthesis does is the ideal way to go about it, but i think its better than no change. which is what i think destroy does. it basically reverts the galaxy back to the state it was in before the cycle started. the conflict will arise again. its extremely naive to assume it wont. the history of organic life is an overwhelming amount of evidence that says it will happen again.

i think a more ideal scenario would be to basically just turn the cycle off and then let those that want synthesis get it. i dont think it will create perfect peace forever because that is insanely unrealistic, but i do think it represents longer lasting peace than any of the other options. and i think that synthesis is very near where evolution will take us anyway. as now synthesis is forced but i feel like once organics get that perspective most of them would be ok with it, though im sure some will still not.

basically what im saying is, i think that choosing destroy only shows that organics are insane and willing to kill what they dont really understand and choose something destructive over something that promotes some kind of peace and understanding.

i know this is probably a pessimistic point of view but im just calling it like i see it. organics kind of suck at life, especially when in large groups.