User blog comment:Humans Vanish/Vandalism/@comment-3546856-20110425020038/@comment-743796-20110425020818

regardless, and based on my last post I'm not currently taking a side on the issue, just because you define the term based on an academic definition (supposedly) doesn't mean it is a rational term. It is insulting to some degree and can be viewed as hostile language to some parties, such as Lancer. By extension you are using the terminology as a fallacy of appealing to ignorance: proving a point based on the apparent lack of evidence to support the other side of the argument.