User talk:DeldiRe/Archive 1

Hi, welcome to Mass Effect Wiki! Thanks for your edit to the User blog:Garhdo/Multiplayer characters. page.

Be sure to check out our Style Guide and Community Guidelines to help you get started, and please leave a message on my talk page if I can help with anything! -- Teugene (Talk) 09:23, 25 May 2012

Editing Another User's User Space
Please do not make changes to pages that are in another user's user space. This goes against wiki policy, and can result in a ban. You should not edit pages that are under User:(another user's screen name), e.g. User:Trandra/Sandbox/Engineer (multiplayer).

Let me know if you have any questions. Trandra 14:00, May 30, 2012 (UTC)


 * Sorry for the dit i didn't saw it when i red the policy. I just wanted to help in your project that i support.


 * Kind regards,


 * DeldiRe


 * If you'd like to support that project, please check out this forum thread--Forum:MP Class pages and comment or vote. Trandra 00:18, June 1, 2012 (UTC)

leaving
I would like to thank you for your mature opinions and for the support you expressed me recently. I’m sorry I haven’t had a chance to get to know you, and will not, either, or at least not on this wiki, as I am | leaving for good. Farewell. --Ygrain (talk) 11:45, January 21, 2013 (UTC)

It as really a sad decision but i can clearly understand your frustration and your uncomprehension, i feel the same way. I hope that you are not the first of a larger group to leave this wiki. Nevertheless you are still welcome if you want to come back :)--DeldiRe 14:55, January 22, 2013 (UTC)

Cleanup tactics page
I'm currently trying to cleanup the tactics page of ennemies (I begin with ME3) because there is too much information and most of them ar irrelevant. I proceed with those criteria :
 * I delete repetition
 * I try to merge similar information
 * I delete general info (such as Overload is good against shield and Warp againt armor), these informations belong to the power pages.
 * I delete information who are too specific (like a krogan can have x% against such type with this shtogun and this power in this difficulty)
 * I try to simplify the infos
 * I transform specific info into general remarks (ex: Javelin pass trough the shiel of the guardian -> piercing dammage can pass trought the shield of the guardian)

My methodology is, of course, open to discussion.

--DeldiRe 15:25, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
 * I am going to say this bluntly because there is no nice way to say this. I can honestly say that is the worst cleanup job I have seen. You removed so much valid content that I cannot even believe you would call that cleanup. I had to repeatedly question whether or not it was vandalism. You do need more experience and more familiarity with how tactics sections work before you just start slashing content. Lancer1289 (talk) 20:54, February 19, 2013 (UTC)


 * I can hear your comment but how can you honneslty thinking that "Overload on a Nemesis is effective" is a relevant information for this page. The tactics page are overwhelmed with useless info who hide the information really interessant to understand the capacity of ennemies. Nevertheless, as I said my vision is submitted to debate, if you feel that i deleted too much, you are free to undo (I only made cleanup for cerberus force in ME3).

But how dare can you accuse me of vandalism ? I prefer to be a vandal for one page than be a vandal for the whole wiki as you are with your attitude (and I do not speak of your reaction to my "cleanups" --DeldiRe 23:22, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
 * I am sorry that you took offense, but there really was no other way to describe it and how bad it really was and how it looked. I felt that you did need that perspective on just how bad it looked. You removed so much content, that it looked exactly what a vandal would do, deleting large swaths of content under a guise or nothing. You also removed so much valid content, specially character and class specific stuff, that is again something that a vandal would do because they did not like it. It was a very serious issue and one that I can honestly say that I have not seen before, nor hope to see again.
 * Will I admit they do need cleanup? Yes they do. Is there redundant content? Probably. But removing large swaths of content based on a badly defined set of guidelines and with no discussion I might add is not the way to do it. When implementing large scale cleaup projects, it is best to at least discuss it first with a senior editor or admin to ensure that the backfire is not as serious. Lancer1289 (talk) 01:33, February 20, 2013 (UTC)

I will then launch a forum to create new guidelines for tactics pages to clean and reorganize this real flow of informations. And stop telling me that i acted as a vandal, I explained my vision which is not "i do not like it, i remove it". I just tried to reorganize and remove the informations who did not belong to the page (overload good for stripping shields belong to overload page). But I have others ideas in order to improve those pages and i will submit them to the community. --DeldiRe 09:23, February 22, 2013 (UTC)

Please
Please stop making edits to character articles. What you are doing does not fit with how articles are to be formatted. If a character only appears in one game, then do not add a header for that game. Only a spoiler tag is necessary. We do not need unnecessary headers, especially when they end up forcing a Table of Contents. ONly if characters appear in multiple games or have need of a tactics section do they required multiple headers. In the future, please do check with someone first before doing something like this because there may be things you are unaware of. Lancer1289 (talk) 18:28, February 22, 2013 (UTC)
 * Do not begin to unedit what I have done. I just try to make character articles coherent with each others. None of them was layouted in the same way.Ans for the poeple appearing only in one game, i did not add a TOC. Furthemore, those character could still appears in further release --DeldiRe 18:32, February 22, 2013 (UTC)
 * And I will be going through all of the edits because there are inconsistencies. You keep adding headers where they are unneeded, you have forced ToC's when they are unneeded, you have added clr tags which add huge amounts of space in articles. Putting huge spaces in articles just makes every article look unprofessional and sloppy. Lancer1289 (talk) 18:35, February 22, 2013 (UTC)
 * Again it is YOUR vision that you put forward. I just made the article more consisten with each other. How dare can you just undo like that. Stop doing that and open YOUR vision to debate with others. I'm tired of your attitude. --DeldiRe 18:40, February 22, 2013 (UTC)
 * Moreover you changed everything i have done even things that are not against your **** vision. Like new chapter style to fit with other articles... --DeldiRe 18:41, February 22, 2013 (UTC)
 * Really? I have found at least 10 articles where you have forced a TOC for two or less sections. I have found at least 15 articles where you have added a header when something/someone only appears in one game/comic/book and that is unnecessary. I have found a number of clr tags when they are not necessary. Clr tags are to be added on an as needed basis. This is your vision you are forcing, not a standard one. You keep doing this and you keep proving that you do not understand how things work. You keep doing large scale things without checking with someone first, and I am getting sick of it. You know the procedure for making large scale changes, and you do not follow it. Twice now. Lancer1289 (talk) 18:46, February 22, 2013 (UTC)

Lets let cool heads prevail here, guys. I suggest that you both step back and cool down a bit before things escalate.--Legionwrex (talk) 18:44, February 22, 2013 (UTC)
 * When people cannot at least check with someone first before making large scale changes, then that is a problem and I cannot let it go. Lancer1289 (talk) 18:46, February 22, 2013 (UTC)

I m tired of arguing with you on every point, it is hopeless, you always stick to your vision. I think that you won, i won't make further edit until you leave, once and for all, this wiki. I hope that more capable poeple will replace you soon enough (and there is plenty of them among the editors such as legionwrex, trandra TE78, ...). And to rephrase you, I'm sick of your insult (vandalism, morron, noob,...) toward me and other users. And to respond to my edits, I made them only to make every articles formated in the same way to look more professionnal but it seems that for you it is sloppy, such as everything you do not like. Ah and one last thing, when i tried to ask a change in large scale with the right template, you just mocked me because it was a fail attempt just because my template was'nt perfect (because it was one of my first edit). See you. nb: It is the first time that I want to break the language policy, but Im to polite to do so... --DeldiRe 19:37, February 22, 2013 (UTC)

@legionwrex : Thank you for your intervention but I already cooled my head more than once. And as we say in Belgium "too much is too much".--DeldiRe 19:42, February 22, 2013 (UTC)
 * (edit conflict) And you have to keep arguing because you have never understood how things work. Any time that large scale edits are to be made, you are required to check with someone first, not just go off and do what you want. And you did that...twice. The reason for this is to ensure standards and to ensure that the person doing it does it the right way. You have twice just went off and did your own thing and that just is not tolerated. So far, just about every major change has either been talked over with an admin at the very least, or gone into the projects forum. The last two character page cleanups where in the projects forum. You just went off and did what you want with no discussion, no consideration for standards, and absolutely nothing to check you until after you start. If you had come to anyone first, you would have gotten feedback and it would not have backfired.
 * There is also just something I will not tolerate, someone putting words into my mouth. I have never called you a "noob", "moron", or a vandal. I had little choice but to give you a very real perspective about what it looked like. You went off and did want you want without consulting anyone about what the standards were. You just did what you wanted, with what you thought was right, and removed what you thought was irrelevant. You again did this without any consultation and without talking to anyone. This cannot be tolerated and will not be tolerated. Your reaction to this was entirely overblown and if you had been much more reasonable, things would have worked out, but again, it was clear that you never read any site policies and just did want you wanted. Large edits are required to be checked with first because of the amount of articles they will impact. This has worked quite successfully in the past, and you did not even bother to even try. Therefore, the fault for this is entirely on your own. No one I know would start making large changes and then say, "oh if you want to discuss it, fine, but I'm going to keep doing what I think is right". You talk first, then work, not the other way around. Lancer1289 (talk) 19:53, February 22, 2013 (UTC)
 * Hilarious you just said 4 times the same things. Keep talking you made my day. And by the way. Check with an admins ? There is none... Only 3 for a huge wiki (and one of them is a complete [put the word you want to hear] --DeldiRe 19:59, February 22, 2013 (UTC)

Oh and by the way : "Administrators should not use their administrator powers to settle editing disputes; for example, to lock a page on a version he or she prefers in an editing dispute that isn't vandalism. Administrator powers should be use to help keep the wiki clear of vandalism, spam, and users who make malicious edits, but not for simple disagreements between users acting in good faith. Ideally an admin shouldn't be considered "in charge". The ideal admin is just someone who is trusted to have a few extra buttons and to use them for the benefit of the Wikia community."--DeldiRe 10:46, February 25, 2013 (UTC)

Final Warning
Any further violation of site policy will result in a ban. Your comments are completely uncalled for and your repeated insulting attitude is not helping anything. Your persistent harassment is also a violation of site policy. Break any site policy again, and you will face a ban for your behavior. Lancer1289 (talk) 19:54, February 23, 2013 (UTC)


 * "Your comments are completely uncalled for and your repeated insulting attitude is not helping anything." Taking into account how you've been in some recent posts, wouldn't this mean you'de have to ban yourself via the same context? Avg Man (talk) 02:27, February 24, 2013 (UTC)


 * Not that it annoy me because I won't edit anymore. But why I m blocked? I did'nt comment or edit anything since the "final warning". --DeldiRe 13:19, February 24, 2013 (UTC)

That is true, actually. Tali&#39;s no.1 fan (talk) 13:34, February 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * You are blocked because Commdor and I were both of the opinion that your blatant violations of site policy (and there is literally no way you can spin calling another editor a complete moron as anything but a willful violation of site policy) warranted an immediate ban. Don't blame Lancer. The decision to impose the ban was made by Commdor and I. The really funny thing is, it was also the two of us who decided on the ban for TellNo1, which DeldiRe was referring to while insulting Lancer.
 * To be perfectly clear, insulting other editors is intolerable, and in this case, it was done openly and blatantly, in direct defiance of site policy. DeldiRe is more than welcome to resume editing after the ban expires, provided there are no further repeat occurrences of this boorish behavior. SpartHawg948 (talk) 11:43, February 25, 2013 (UTC)

I won't oppose the temporary ban because i know that I deserved it and I never said and I never will say otherwise. Nevertheless, I hope that you will soon enough understand that there is a serious issue when we compare the admin policy and the behaviour of some admin (and I won't give a name or I will be accused of a vendetta).

I explain myself, it is clearly stated that an admin may not impose his will "to settle editing dispute wich was clearly the case in most of my "debate" with Lancer. And it is often the case when Lancer "debate" with others editors. You can't deny that. Moreover, it is clearly stated that the contribution of an editor acting in good faith (what I always did on this wiki, I just want to improve a fabulous tool that I use very, maybe too, often) can't be deleted by admin without a proper debate.

And last but not least, I hope that you will be smart to enough to not judge my point in regard of what I said to Lancer. I know that it was not the better option to resolve the problem but, actually, it was the only way to have some attention from the administration.

kr, --DeldiRe 11:58, February 25, 2013 (UTC)

Oh, and btw, I still wait a response of Lancer on the debate that i launch on the "hazard" talk page. I think this is an interessant topic to talk about (can we use "canon" when we speak about gameplay?) --DeldiRe 12:00, February 25, 2013 (UTC)

I'm impressed.
You've done a really good job on editing the ME:infiltrator pages. Sorry that I've been no help at all...--TW6464 (talk) 13:32, March 26, 2013 (UTC)

I will keep working on this to improve content. You are welcome to add some comment or to correct spelling/grammar/layout.

And thank you for your support. I wanted to start that work a bit earlier but i was delayed by my "little" argumentation with Lancer. Nevertheless, work is going on. --DeldiRe 13:51, March 26, 2013 (UTC)

Okay, I'll try to when I can.--TW6464 (talk) 13:58, March 26, 2013 (UTC)


 * once again, extremely impressed. You've pretty much taken this whole d*mn effort on your shoulders. Fantastic job. And again, I apologize for being a lazy bum. I've had a project I needed to do for my health class, and it's taken whatever time I got, man.--TW6464 (talk) 13:51, April 22, 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your support, it gives me more motivation ;) --DeldiRe 13:52, April 22, 2013 (UTC)

THANKS
Thanks for the resent edits at the ME 3 infiltrator, it only a few that have played the game(who edits on this wiki), and its valueble information :)--Perkins98 (talk) 17:31, March 26, 2013 (UTC)

Ty for support, I'm still working on it--DeldiRe 19:05, March 26, 2013 (UTC)

MEI Logo
I uploaded a logo you can put at the top of your sandbox page to match the other game pages: File:Mass Effect Infiltrator logo.png. Trandra (talk) 21:14, March 28, 2013 (UTC)

Thank you, it is added. I'm now waiting a lot of screenshot on my mailbox (hard to transfer picture from my tablet to my PC :s) and I will improve the work that you made for weapons and powers for MEI.--DeldiRe 21:23, March 28, 2013 (UTC)

Then I guess that you support my new version of ME:I main page. Do not hesitate to edit my sandbox to correct it so it will be ready to launch sooner. --DeldiRe 21:26, March 28, 2013 (UTC)

Multiupload Page
I'm not sure if you know this already, but we've got a Special:MultipleUpload for uploading several images at a time.

And please add  in the description (you only have to do it in the single description box at the bottom for multi-upload). I'm trying to clean up the Uncategorized Images.

Thanks!

Trandra (talk) 07:56, April 17, 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the info, I will do it for the next upload wave. (and thanks for your fixes) --DeldiRe 08:17, April 17, 2013 (UTC)


 * No problem. The pages are starting to look nice and filled out! I will probably work a bit more on walkthrough specifics when I feel like playing through MEI again. I'm going to reset my game so I can specify where the credit consoles and wall-safes can be picked up. Trandra (talk) 08:20, April 17, 2013 (UTC)


 * Perfect, i will focus on screenshots because it is harder for me to write coherent and good walkthrough. But as you said, I'm already glad of the work that we already done, MEI content will soon meet the wikia quality standards.--DeldiRe 08:43, April 17, 2013 (UTC)


 * I have just cleaned all the pictures I uploaded by giving them several category. --DeldiRe 07:46, April 23, 2013 (UTC)

Bray Proposal
So far, you've gotten a good reception for your call for a Bray article. Including the two of us, four have spoken in favor to zero against. I suggest formerly putting forth a proposal (i.e., putting forth a vote). Thanks. TheUnknown285 (talk) 13:42, April 28, 2013 (UTC)


 * @DeldiRe - As I've mentioned on the project page, since this is a project proposal, you or other users who support it need to first produce the Bray article in a sandbox for the community to examine before any vote can be opened. -- Commdor (Talk) 18:23, April 28, 2013 (UTC)


 * @commdor : see on forum page.--DeldiRe 19:05, April 28, 2013 (UTC)

Just a note
The word is spelled ENEMY in English. That is eNemy. A single "n," unlike the French word. Trandra (talk) 20:50, May 2, 2013 (UTC)


 * ahah Thanks, I make always the mistake because of the french word :) I will do my best to avoid that. --DeldiRe 08:38, May 3, 2013 (UTC)

extra space advisory
wikia seems to be forcing extra spaces at the end of all section-based edits lately, and since you're one of those who still bother to contribute i'd like to bring this issue to mind.

namely, check for any spaces at the very end of any edit you make. if there's any, backspace it. helps save time from having to correct oversights like this. thanks. T̴̴͕̲̞̳̖̼̱͒͛̎͒ͫ̃ͧeͩ̈̽̈҉͓̝̰̼̦̫̤̀͠m̫̪̪̯̻͎̫̅̇̓̇͌̚p̸̙̝̓̓͌ͨ͆ͣͥ̂̕o͒̽͐̽͏̞̬̻͕͔͕͚̰͍͠͞ṙ̢̞͚͈̹̰ͨ̓ͭ̈́̌ạ̢̧̪̹̺̺̣̹̲͂͆̏ͪͨ͒ͭř̹͈͜͠y̷͍̻̜̹̼̾̽̈́e̵̹̼̟̦͚͐̈́͌͘d͉̲̣̻͉̱͗̅ḭ̷̻̆͋̆̓̔͝t̨͍̦̫̗͂̅̍̋̆ͩ͝ộ̫̟̬̳̝̲̾ͫ̒̿ͮ̑̚rͯ̎ͨͭ̄̿̽͛҉̠̫̱̠̘̘̲́ͅ7̩̻ͤͩͨ͝͡8̜̣̙͇̻ͨ͛͛̆͒̆̽̒͐͜͡ ͥ̍̉̃̇ͥ̓ͨ͏̕҉̥̹͓̗̤̠̖̤ (talk) 15:17, June 8, 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the advice TE, I had also seen it but didn't know the reason--DeldiRe 19:58, June 8, 2013 (UTC)

Something I learned about Projects Forum votes
What I've discovered about the whole "don't open voting when you open the project" strategy is that people will come by during initial discussion and say something positive, but then they won't remember/bother to come back when you open voting and vote. So I had a project pass literally 1-0-0 with only my own vote! Which I guess worked out for me that time, but it felt weird. So then the next time I opened a (very similar) project, I just opened voting right away along with discussion. That time people did the same thing of coming along and saying something positive... AND they voted Yes. So anyway, probably says something about human nature, making people stop by twice means you won't get as many folks stopping by. Use at your discretion :-) Cattlesquat (talk) 21:47, June 17, 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks buddy, I already saw that but I already tried (for MEI project) to do that and, guess what, lancer came and deleted my vote and said that it is needed to open a discussion first. Just look to the log of this huge project and check the only comment he posted. So this time I wanted to follow the rules but it seems that it is not enough. --DeldiRe 21:53, June 17, 2013 (UTC)


 * If there's a policy that you can't open voting along with a reasonably complete sandbox mockup, then I certainly can't find that policy anywhere. And I've seen several "projects forum" items other than mine that started right out with voting open and proceeded to fruition undisturbed. I'm not saying I'm infallible on the point of finding & knowing all the policies, but if it happens again I recommend raising and if necessary escalating as a point of order. Cattlesquat (talk) 22:01, June 17, 2013 (UTC)


 * I also did not saw it on the MoS, however you know how certain people use MoS as they see fit..--DeldiRe 22:08, June 17, 2013 (UTC)


 * By the way, thanks for your support by saying the things as they were. --DeldiRe 22:12, June 17, 2013 (UTC)


 * No problem. I think Commdor is operating in good faith & missed and/or differently-interpreted Trandra's note, plus didn't know about the Wikia changes. I vaguely wish we weren't so delete-first-ask-questions-later around here but that's more a matter of personal preference and overall I think it's all straightening itself out. And I feel where you're coming from about other totally separate situations and I've certainly got my wikia-ears perked up when making-up-the-rules-as-we-go-along surfaces to be a loud voice against it. Your faithful servant, etc. Cattlesquat (talk) 22:44, June 17, 2013 (UTC)


 * Oh and on the ironic side the massive # of "discussion" edits have moved your article to the enviable top spot in the "hot items" list, which will certainly attract more eyes and probably voters to your issue. No guarantee how they'll vote of course, but at least you'll get the eyes. Your faithful servant, etc. Cattlesquat (talk) 22:50, June 17, 2013 (UTC)


 * Yep as you said, Commdor is acting in good faith, I'm sure of it, but I still do no like the "deletefirstaskafter" especially with familiar editors. And as I said, I'm glad that Comdor took part in the content discussion. It's just too bad that we came with that discussion about upload, I knew we would came to this that's why i did not wanted to upload any video in the first place --DeldiRe 22:55, June 17, 2013 (UTC)

N7HQ Datapad Images
File:ME3 N7HQ Garvug.png, File:ME3 N7HQ Hourglass Nebula.png, and File:ME3 N7HQ Omega.png (the locations in the Terminus Systems) have all been uploaded for you to use in your Sandbox. Trandra (talk) 13:37, June 25, 2013 (UTC)

Thank you Trandra !!--DeldiRe 13:47, June 25, 2013 (UTC)


 * If you are using Chrome (or Firefox, which behaves similarly), you can right-click on something and "Inspect the element" or "View Source." It's easy in Chrome, since it has a developer tool that shows the source code (CSS or JS file). One of the little subwindows shows what background images are being pulled in by calls to the CSS file. You have to click on the proper "div" to find it, though. If you don't understand enough HTML or CSS to know which one is the right div, then I can take care of it. Trandra (talk) 15:32, June 25, 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks again. I tried to do something for the layout, what do you think ? Terminus system only for now. I can also implement that for the datapad article. Feel free to edit my sandbox if you have an idea (different layout, coding, size of pictures,...). I can easily revert it if needed.--DeldiRe 22:41, June 25, 2013 (UTC)


 * xpost xpost. since there seems to be no differences in terms of flavor text between the browser and app versions of datapad, you can simply insert one intro paragraph in the galaxy of war section saying that the browser version dishes out galactic readiness percentage rewards as opposed to credits or something. then the rest follows as such or something similar:

Pinnacle Station: Command Center – Formerly a military training Facility, Pinnacle Station has been repurposed as a command and control center for Council forces.
 * Earth Alliance Space
 * Alliance forces repelled the enemy assault and kept Pinnacle Station functional.
 * (Credits : 75) (Galactic Readiness : +2.80%)

now, excuse me while i go enjoy SC2: HoTS' campaign mode. T̴̴͕̲̞̳̖̼̱͒͛̎͒ͫ̃ͧeͩ̈̽̈҉͓̝̰̼̦̫̤̀͠m̫̪̪̯̻͎̫̅̇̓̇͌̚p̸̙̝̓̓͌ͨ͆ͣͥ̂̕o͒̽͐̽͏̞̬̻͕͔͕͚̰͍͠͞ṙ̢̞͚͈̹̰ͨ̓ͭ̈́̌ạ̢̧̪̹̺̺̣̹̲͂͆̏ͪͨ͒ͭř̹͈͜͠y̷͍̻̜̹̼̾̽̈́e̵̹̼̟̦͚͐̈́͌͘d͉̲̣̻͉̱͗̅ḭ̷̻̆͋̆̓̔͝t̨͍̦̫̗͂̅̍̋̆ͩ͝ộ̫̟̬̳̝̲̾ͫ̒̿ͮ̑̚rͯ̎ͨͭ̄̿̽͛҉̠̫̱̠̘̘̲́ͅ7̩̻ͤͩͨ͝͡8̜̣̙͇̻ͨ͛͛̆͒̆̽̒͐͜͡ ͥ̍̉̃̇ͥ̓ͨ͏̕҉̥̹͓̗̤̠̖̤ (talk) 03:01, June 28, 2013 (UTC)


 * I was thinking the same thing. A specific page for the mini game (with the two versions) and a link to this page from datapad and N7 HQ page. However, put this into the Mass Effect 3: Galaxy at War article yet better because we have also lots of similar infos on the MEI section (mechanism to increase war assets and/or readiness). I propose to :


 * Add a chapter about EMS (war asset total, military strenght * readiness = EMS) for clarity.
 * Replace the chapter about Mass Effect datapad by the a complete article about the mini game (with an explanation of the two versions)
 * delete the whole text on datapad article and replace it by a simple intro (mini game to improve readiness with fleets/missions system, based on credits/evolution of the fleets system, replaced by a web broswer version which delete the credits/evolution mechanism,...) and a link (main page : galaxy at war #minigame)
 * Add the N7 HQ article with only a short intro of the mini games and not the whole text/pictures (permit to improve your readiness with fleets/missions system, this game replace datapad bu without credit/evolution mechanism,...).

The hard with that is to make a good article which includes the two version of the game. We can try to do it on my sandbox. Thoughts ? Trandra, thoughts ? Anyone else ? --DeldiRe 10:05, June 28, 2013 (UTC)

Hi TE78, could you take a high quality pictures of the galaxy map please ? It could flesh this article with a "cover" pictures : User:DeldiRe/Sandbox/Mass Effect 3: Galaxy At War.

And I think that the web browser mini game is bugged because I can only send Three fleets on missions, after that, the "game" is bugged and do not launch further fleets. Have you the same problem ? --DeldiRe 10:06, July 2, 2013 (UTC)

Hi Commdor, As you can see, the integration of the mini game mechanisms (from both version, lets say V.ios and V.HQ) is a proposal of TE78. I was not really in favor of that to begin with but when I was thinking, it seems to be the best way to do it because : Thoughts ?--DeldiRe 08:03, July 9, 2013 (UTC)
 * The datapad and N7HQ article are not overflowned with a huge amount of info but just with a clear description of what the game is and a link with the detailed content (such as for the e-mail section of the datapad).
 * Galaxy At War article is more complete because it show every possibilty to improve your readiness. For example, imagine a player who do not know nothing about ME who want to improve his readiness. He will come to that article and will be glad to see that a mini game is available and that it can improve the readiness even more than multiplayer. He will then look after the N7 HQ website.
 * All informations about the mini game can be found in one place, it is then easier to understand that there is two separated version and that one replaced the first with another mechanism. (but I'm sure that we can improve the explanation I gave for more clarity).
 * The part "theaters of operations" is located on the good page and is only about "lore" and there is no part of gameplay mechanism in it (such as the rewars which are redundant). Which is good for poeple who are redrect there due to there search on quariant colony (KetOsh) for example.


 * Except the mini-game is not a separate entity from either the Datapad app or N7 HQ, it's a feature in both. The gameplay information belongs in those articles, not the Galaxy at War page, because that page's purpose is to provide only an overview of the Galaxy at War system. Readers looking to learn more about how GaW tie-in media can improve their Galactic Readiness can navigate to the articles about those tie-ins. -- Commdor (Talk) 00:24, July 10, 2013 (UTC)

Sure but as it was, you had a link on both page. As it is now, you have no much info on datapad and everything on N7HQ and the separation between the two version is not so easy to understand. Moreover, you putted the credits reward in the N7HQ article which have no sense ;) because credits belong to datapad :). That, at least must change. --DeldiRe 07:24, July 10, 2013 (UTC)

read articles before inserting information
i've had to revert some of your trivia since you aren't reading the ME3 sections of the affected characters. which pretty much says the same things.

as such, most of the stuff you're adding aren't trivia. they're better off incorporated under === Mass Effect 3: Citadel === subsections.

exceptions probably allowable for those without their own ME3 sections like schells, mouse, etc. T̴̴͕̲̞̳̖̼̱͒͛̎͒ͫ̃ͧeͩ̈̽̈҉͓̝̰̼̦̫̤̀͠m̫̪̪̯̻͎̫̅̇̓̇͌̚p̸̙̝̓̓͌ͨ͆ͣͥ̂̕o͒̽͐̽͏̞̬̻͕͔͕͚̰͍͠͞ṙ̢̞͚͈̹̰ͨ̓ͭ̈́̌ạ̢̧̪̹̺̺̣̹̲͂͆̏ͪͨ͒ͭř̹͈͜͠y̷͍̻̜̹̼̾̽̈́e̵̹̼̟̦͚͐̈́͌͘d͉̲̣̻͉̱͗̅ḭ̷̻̆͋̆̓̔͝t̨͍̦̫̗͂̅̍̋̆ͩ͝ộ̫̟̬̳̝̲̾ͫ̒̿ͮ̑̚rͯ̎ͨͭ̄̿̽͛҉̠̫̱̠̘̘̲́ͅ7̩̻ͤͩͨ͝͡8̜̣̙͇̻ͨ͛͛̆͒̆̽̒͐͜͡ ͥ̍̉̃̇ͥ̓ͨ͏̕҉̥̹͓̗̤̠̖̤ (talk) 13:22, July 17, 2013 (UTC)

Yep, my bad, sorry for that. As you said, it is still relevant for minor characters from ME1. --DeldiRe 13:46, July 17, 2013 (UTC)

Request
I have a little request for you.

Unlike you I have no account and I can't add any pictures like you can. I asked administrators to do this, but they ignore me like the Council ignore Shepard.

On talk page of ME:Paragon lost characters I put a suggestion to add the collector general as an adversary and gave even a link to the film and a moment time of good character picture. I ask you to take that picture and add it. Please, do that. 78.8.131.1 21:09, July 25, 2013 (UTC)


 * I will look into it. However, don't be afraid to create your own user account to start useful edits. --DeldiRe 22:19, July 25, 2013 (UTC)

Due to the low quality version of my film, I can't get a good screenshot. You can try to do it yourself if you ask help to temporary editor78. I'm now off for holidays so I can't look to that issue anymore. --DeldiRe 22:20, July 28, 2013 (UTC)

Welcome back!
If you're interested and in case you hadn't noticed during your absence, there is some news about key people working on the next Mass Effect game.

And it might sound silly coming from the newcomer, but regardless: Welcome back! — Elseweyr (talk) 08:39, August 19, 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the info and for the welcome message, it is always a pleasure to receive such attention ;). I also have seen that an app (final hours of ME3) was published on Origin but it is not stated on the main page and no info about it can be found on the wiki, do you have more infos about it ? --DeldiRe 08:42, August 19, 2013 (UTC)


 * Glad you're back! Cattlesquat (talk) 22:12, August 19, 2013 (UTC)


 * About the FHOME3: While it's technically a Mass Effect app, it's been around for a year, and I dare reason there'd be an article about it already should it merit one. I'll get back to you once I've familiarized myself with it, though. — Elseweyr (talk) 23:09, August 19, 2013 (UTC)

I will download it during the week and do the same. After that, let's go for a common sandbox.

I also have in mind several corrections related to art and interactive content :
 * more infos on the art book page (the description of the art of mass effect universe isn't really complete but I need more infos that i'm currently gathering.
 * In the main page, I will ask to add a scroll in "other media" with a scroll "interactive content" (ME: datapad, N7 HQ & FHOME3).
 * Regroup ME film and MEPL into one single scroll ? (where I can add trailers page :D )--DeldiRe 23:32, August 19, 2013 (UTC)

Mass_Effect_Logo.png
rename to File:Mass Effect Galaxy Logo.png.

because of obvious reasons.

i suppose i can always petition a rename of the file in its talkpage, or rename it outright, but 1) that's just needless red tape and 2) as file uploader you had to be kept in the loop.

i just need your consent to rename so i can validly file an edit reason ASAP saying "author request". T̴̴͕̲̞̳̖̼̱͒͛̎͒ͫ̃ͧeͩ̈̽̈҉͓̝̰̼̦̫̤̀͠m̫̪̪̯̻͎̫̅̇̓̇͌̚p̸̙̝̓̓͌ͨ͆ͣͥ̂̕o͒̽͐̽͏̞̬̻͕͔͕͚̰͍͠͞ṙ̢̞͚͈̹̰ͨ̓ͭ̈́̌ạ̢̧̪̹̺̺̣̹̲͂͆̏ͪͨ͒ͭř̹͈͜͠y̷͍̻̜̹̼̾̽̈́e̵̹̼̟̦͚͐̈́͌͘d͉̲̣̻͉̱͗̅ḭ̷̻̆͋̆̓̔͝t̨͍̦̫̗͂̅̍̋̆ͩ͝ộ̫̟̬̳̝̲̾ͫ̒̿ͮ̑̚rͯ̎ͨͭ̄̿̽͛҉̠̫̱̠̘̘̲́ͅ7̩̻ͤͩͨ͝͡8̜̣̙͇̻ͨ͛͛̆͒̆̽̒͐͜͡ ͥ̍̉̃̇ͥ̓ͨ͏̕҉̥̹͓̗̤̠̖̤ (talk) 12:34, August 26, 2013 (UTC)

Granted, I made a false manip when I renamed it on my computer and I forget to ask you to change the name. Do you take care of the changes needed on the 2 pages where it is used ? --DeldiRe (talk) 12:40, August 26, 2013 (UTC)


 * ✓ T̴̴͕̲̞̳̖̼̱͒͛̎͒ͫ̃ͧeͩ̈̽̈҉͓̝̰̼̦̫̤̀͠m̫̪̪̯̻͎̫̅̇̓̇͌̚p̸̙̝̓̓͌ͨ͆ͣͥ̂̕o͒̽͐̽͏̞̬̻͕͔͕͚̰͍͠͞ṙ̢̞͚͈̹̰ͨ̓ͭ̈́̌ạ̢̧̪̹̺̺̣̹̲͂͆̏ͪͨ͒ͭř̹͈͜͠y̷͍̻̜̹̼̾̽̈́e̵̹̼̟̦͚͐̈́͌͘d͉̲̣̻͉̱͗̅ḭ̷̻̆͋̆̓̔͝t̨͍̦̫̗͂̅̍̋̆ͩ͝ộ̫̟̬̳̝̲̾ͫ̒̿ͮ̑̚rͯ̎ͨͭ̄̿̽͛҉̠̫̱̠̘̘̲́ͅ7̩̻ͤͩͨ͝͡8̜̣̙͇̻ͨ͛͛̆͒̆̽̒͐͜͡ ͥ̍̉̃̇ͥ̓ͨ͏̕҉̥̹͓̗̤̠̖̤ (talk) 12:44, August 26, 2013 (UTC)

stop what you're doing
i don't see any discussion on this T̴̴͕̲̞̳̖̼̱͒͛̎͒ͫ̃ͧeͩ̈̽̈҉͓̝̰̼̦̫̤̀͠m̫̪̪̯̻͎̫̅̇̓̇͌̚p̸̙̝̓̓͌ͨ͆ͣͥ̂̕o͒̽͐̽͏̞̬̻͕͔͕͚̰͍͠͞ṙ̢̞͚͈̹̰ͨ̓ͭ̈́̌ạ̢̧̪̹̺̺̣̹̲͂͆̏ͪͨ͒ͭř̹͈͜͠y̷͍̻̜̹̼̾̽̈́e̵̹̼̟̦͚͐̈́͌͘d͉̲̣̻͉̱͗̅ḭ̷̻̆͋̆̓̔͝t̨͍̦̫̗͂̅̍̋̆ͩ͝ộ̫̟̬̳̝̲̾ͫ̒̿ͮ̑̚rͯ̎ͨͭ̄̿̽͛҉̠̫̱̠̘̘̲́ͅ7̩̻ͤͩͨ͝͡8̜̣̙͇̻ͨ͛͛̆͒̆̽̒͐͜͡ ͥ̍̉̃̇ͥ̓ͨ͏̕҉̥̹͓̗̤̠̖̤ (talk) 09:49, August 28, 2013 (UTC)

Actually there is, let me put the link in one moment --DeldiRe (talk) 09:50, August 28, 2013 (UTC)

There : (section HUB page)
 * http://masseffect.wikia.com/wiki/Talk:Mass_Effect:_Homeworlds
 * http://masseffect.wikia.com/wiki/Talk:Mass_Effect:_Foundation

May I proceed ? I did not received further comments and nobody was against that change so I think this is enough to proceed --DeldiRe (talk) 09:52, August 28, 2013 (UTC)

did homeworlds exceed 4 issues?

there's your answer. T̴̴͕̲̞̳̖̼̱͒͛̎͒ͫ̃ͧeͩ̈̽̈҉͓̝̰̼̦̫̤̀͠m̫̪̪̯̻͎̫̅̇̓̇͌̚p̸̙̝̓̓͌ͨ͆ͣͥ̂̕o͒̽͐̽͏̞̬̻͕͔͕͚̰͍͠͞ṙ̢̞͚͈̹̰ͨ̓ͭ̈́̌ạ̢̧̪̹̺̺̣̹̲͂͆̏ͪͨ͒ͭř̹͈͜͠y̷͍̻̜̹̼̾̽̈́e̵̹̼̟̦͚͐̈́͌͘d͉̲̣̻͉̱͗̅ḭ̷̻̆͋̆̓̔͝t̨͍̦̫̗͂̅̍̋̆ͩ͝ộ̫̟̬̳̝̲̾ͫ̒̿ͮ̑̚rͯ̎ͨͭ̄̿̽͛҉̠̫̱̠̘̘̲́ͅ7̩̻ͤͩͨ͝͡8̜̣̙͇̻ͨ͛͛̆͒̆̽̒͐͜͡ ͥ̍̉̃̇ͥ̓ͨ͏̕҉̥̹͓̗̤̠̖̤ (talk) 09:56, August 28, 2013 (UTC)

Indeed, it didn't but as we said, we can make a special treatment due to its particularity : its 4 different stories. What its your opinion on that topic ? --DeldiRe (talk) 09:58, August 28, 2013 (UTC)

Actually you should also keep informations about artistic team.--DeldiRe (talk) 09:59, August 28, 2013 (UTC)


 * homeworlds and foundation are both anthologies, but there's still existing precedents to deal with.
 * now, homeworlds only has 4 issues. all other multi-issue comics stop at 4. foundation has at least 13. hubbing is totally justifiable for foundation because cramming all 13 issues in 1 page is obviously unwieldly. homeworlds ends up being the odd man out.
 * if another 4-issue anthology comes up (not really sure if 3- or 2-issue ones count), then it's fair game to set up hubs for them by virtue of emerging pattern.
 * for now, feel free to restore artist information only. T̴̴͕̲̞̳̖̼̱͒͛̎͒ͫ̃ͧeͩ̈̽̈҉͓̝̰̼̦̫̤̀͠m̫̪̪̯̻͎̫̅̇̓̇͌̚p̸̙̝̓̓͌ͨ͆ͣͥ̂̕o͒̽͐̽͏̞̬̻͕͔͕͚̰͍͠͞ṙ̢̞͚͈̹̰ͨ̓ͭ̈́̌ạ̢̧̪̹̺̺̣̹̲͂͆̏ͪͨ͒ͭř̹͈͜͠y̷͍̻̜̹̼̾̽̈́e̵̹̼̟̦͚͐̈́͌͘d͉̲̣̻͉̱͗̅ḭ̷̻̆͋̆̓̔͝t̨͍̦̫̗͂̅̍̋̆ͩ͝ộ̫̟̬̳̝̲̾ͫ̒̿ͮ̑̚rͯ̎ͨͭ̄̿̽͛҉̠̫̱̠̘̘̲́ͅ7̩̻ͤͩͨ͝͡8̜̣̙͇̻ͨ͛͛̆͒̆̽̒͐͜͡ ͥ̍̉̃̇ͥ̓ͨ͏̕҉̥̹͓̗̤̠̖̤ (talk) 10:54, August 28, 2013 (UTC)

I do agree with your point except that we shouldn't put the focus on the lengt and the number of issues but more on the content. Never mind we can wait until more comics comes even if it will take a loooong time. btw, who will cover the foundation 2 release (as Commdor is no more present) ? I'd like to do it but my english is too bad to propose a story coverage. --DeldiRe (talk) 11:53, August 28, 2013 (UTC)


 * yeah, no. there's no problem with content, (almost) everything's already there. organization is the issue and i've laid out the rationale already. as for foundation 2, give it a week. T̴̴͕̲̞̳̖̼̱͒͛̎͒ͫ̃ͧeͩ̈̽̈҉͓̝̰̼̦̫̤̀͠m̫̪̪̯̻͎̫̅̇̓̇͌̚p̸̙̝̓̓͌ͨ͆ͣͥ̂̕o͒̽͐̽͏̞̬̻͕͔͕͚̰͍͠͞ṙ̢̞͚͈̹̰ͨ̓ͭ̈́̌ạ̢̧̪̹̺̺̣̹̲͂͆̏ͪͨ͒ͭř̹͈͜͠y̷͍̻̜̹̼̾̽̈́e̵̹̼̟̦͚͐̈́͌͘d͉̲̣̻͉̱͗̅ḭ̷̻̆͋̆̓̔͝t̨͍̦̫̗͂̅̍̋̆ͩ͝ộ̫̟̬̳̝̲̾ͫ̒̿ͮ̑̚rͯ̎ͨͭ̄̿̽͛҉̠̫̱̠̘̘̲́ͅ7̩̻ͤͩͨ͝͡8̜̣̙͇̻ͨ͛͛̆͒̆̽̒͐͜͡ ͥ̍̉̃̇ͥ̓ͨ͏̕҉̥̹͓̗̤̠̖̤ (talk) 12:56, August 28, 2013 (UTC)


 * When I say content I do not mean the content present on the wiki. I merely speak about the idea that ME:homeworlds is four separated stories while others comics are only one story. If you take the problem in that POV, the number of issue is irrelevant because it's the content which is different ;). As for fondation, the content (separated stories) AND the lenght (13 issues) can be used as reasons to create an HUB page. --DeldiRe (talk) 13:00, August 28, 2013 (UTC)

top-down boxes
i'm not really seeing the difference between File:Pirate (Galaxy).png and File:Pirate Elite (Galaxy).png. there's an unused item :File:Pirate Mass Effect Galaxy.png that looks more like your description in the pirate elite page.

if there are errors, please confirm and correct accordingly. i will delete the one that will end up unused. T̴̴͕̲̞̳̖̼̱͒͛̎͒ͫ̃ͧeͩ̈̽̈҉͓̝̰̼̦̫̤̀͠m̫̪̪̯̻͎̫̅̇̓̇͌̚p̸̙̝̓̓͌ͨ͆ͣͥ̂̕o͒̽͐̽͏̞̬̻͕͔͕͚̰͍͠͞ṙ̢̞͚͈̹̰ͨ̓ͭ̈́̌ạ̢̧̪̹̺̺̣̹̲͂͆̏ͪͨ͒ͭř̹͈͜͠y̷͍̻̜̹̼̾̽̈́e̵̹̼̟̦͚͐̈́͌͘d͉̲̣̻͉̱͗̅ḭ̷̻̆͋̆̓̔͝t̨͍̦̫̗͂̅̍̋̆ͩ͝ộ̫̟̬̳̝̲̾ͫ̒̿ͮ̑̚rͯ̎ͨͭ̄̿̽͛҉̠̫̱̠̘̘̲́ͅ7̩̻ͤͩͨ͝͡8̜̣̙͇̻ͨ͛͛̆͒̆̽̒͐͜͡ ͥ̍̉̃̇ͥ̓ͨ͏̕҉̥̹͓̗̤̠̖̤ (talk) 10:26, September 5, 2013 (UTC)


 * I checked it once more and its correct. In fact, the unused file was a mistake because it is not even a pirat, its a batarian terrorist so you can delete that one (I thought that I already put a delete tag).
 * For the others, if you look carefully, you can see the white part on the elite pirat when the legs of the classic pirate are green (I made a precision in the text). --DeldiRe (talk) 13:00, September 5, 2013 (UTC)


 * if anything i'm seeing only a difference between shades of green in the shoulder pads. teal vs light green. nevermind, it's a fairly moot point. T̴̴͕̲̞̳̖̼̱͒͛̎͒ͫ̃ͧeͩ̈̽̈҉͓̝̰̼̦̫̤̀͠m̫̪̪̯̻͎̫̅̇̓̇͌̚p̸̙̝̓̓͌ͨ͆ͣͥ̂̕o͒̽͐̽͏̞̬̻͕͔͕͚̰͍͠͞ṙ̢̞͚͈̹̰ͨ̓ͭ̈́̌ạ̢̧̪̹̺̺̣̹̲͂͆̏ͪͨ͒ͭř̹͈͜͠y̷͍̻̜̹̼̾̽̈́e̵̹̼̟̦͚͐̈́͌͘d͉̲̣̻͉̱͗̅ḭ̷̻̆͋̆̓̔͝t̨͍̦̫̗͂̅̍̋̆ͩ͝ộ̫̟̬̳̝̲̾ͫ̒̿ͮ̑̚rͯ̎ͨͭ̄̿̽͛҉̠̫̱̠̘̘̲́ͅ7̩̻ͤͩͨ͝͡8̜̣̙͇̻ͨ͛͛̆͒̆̽̒͐͜͡ ͥ̍̉̃̇ͥ̓ͨ͏̕҉̥̹͓̗̤̠̖̤ (talk) 13:15, September 5, 2013 (UTC)


 * When they are lying on the floor when they are killed, you can see the difference but yeah enemies are quite similar in that game :) --DeldiRe (talk) 13:42, September 5, 2013 (UTC)

so when was your latest bright idea ever up for community discussion?
don't get me wrong, those twitter feeds will probably get approved down the line with some/a lot of adjustments, but seriously?

WHERE THE FUCK IS THE COMMUNITY INPUT ON THIS?

you of all people should already know the procedure for introducing newish elements into the wiki but you never learn. we never really dealt with massive offsite copypasting before (only text integration and reference-citing whenever needed) and there are multiple things that needed prior feedback. "small" things like layout, formatting, scope of content, article naming conventions, or even the necessity for such an endeavor in the first place. stuff that don't concern the regular folk but are nightmares for the organizational-minded to think things over. utterly trivial issues like the recent romance hullabaloo get discussed over and you just decided you're above such bureaucracy with this wider-ranging project?

consider this a strike one warning. proper channels and proper documentation of project scope and detail, or else.

T̴̴͕̲̞̳̖̼̱͒͛̎͒ͫ̃ͧeͩ̈̽̈҉͓̝̰̼̦̫̤̀͠m̫̪̪̯̻͎̫̅̇̓̇͌̚p̸̙̝̓̓͌ͨ͆ͣͥ̂̕o͒̽͐̽͏̞̬̻͕͔͕͚̰͍͠͞ṙ̢̞͚͈̹̰ͨ̓ͭ̈́̌ạ̢̧̪̹̺̺̣̹̲͂͆̏ͪͨ͒ͭř̹͈͜͠y̷͍̻̜̹̼̾̽̈́e̵̹̼̟̦͚͐̈́͌͘d͉̲̣̻͉̱͗̅ḭ̷̻̆͋̆̓̔͝t̨͍̦̫̗͂̅̍̋̆ͩ͝ộ̫̟̬̳̝̲̾ͫ̒̿ͮ̑̚rͯ̎ͨͭ̄̿̽͛҉̠̫̱̠̘̘̲́ͅ7̩̻ͤͩͨ͝͡8̜̣̙͇̻ͨ͛͛̆͒̆̽̒͐͜͡ ͥ̍̉̃̇ͥ̓ͨ͏̕҉̥̹͓̗̤̠̖̤ (talk) 13:51, September 21, 2013 (UTC)

Are you kidding me ? Why are you so harsh after all the job done on this ? I will answer all your attacks :
 * Copypasting ? It's not copypasting at all, I sorted all the infos (5 differents tweets account + several web page) to put them in a readable way and I added an intro to explain the context. Without that, the story is impossible to understand. Alliance News Network/SolComms is more something like copy paste because it's only one twitter feed (but the intro is interesting to understand the context, like I did for shore leave content).
 * Reference/copypast ? I would have prefer to not copypaste (and put reference instead) but the information needed to be sorted and we have a precedent like (once more) Alliance News Network/SolComms
 * Community input ? I spoke about it during a whole day with Elseweyr (which is the one of the only currently active editor) on the chat. When the FIRST page was completed, i just came to you (on user page) to ask your input (there is two others similar stories to sort -> findleviathan and fight for omega).
 * Procedure ? Forum:Twitter Lore and my sandboxes pages are free to look at and are free to comment for any input.
 * Am I above the discussions ? I certainly do not think that way as you can see that I'm always asking opinion (see MEG template enemy box for example or previous trailer article). I just added a new page and I did not a massive change on the wikia content nor a massive new thing because Alliance News Network/SolComms was already present.

To conclude, you know that I'm open to discussion and that I want to improve the completion of this wiki. There is no need to be harsh and as you can see I tried to follow every procedures even if it's true I implemented the page a bit fast because there was a precedent (in my mind, it was not a big deal, in the contrary it was just a page to fill a hole). And to my defense, you also know that the wiki is currently not with a lot of editors so the community input is really hard to get.

I was also looking to the romance discussion but I'm still building my opinion on it (consensus not yet reached^^) and I will weight my voice if I see that it can be relevant. If not I let the discussion to others. And romance page (one of the most important article of the wiki) can not really be compared with the AAN news feed which is more a secondary article.

Well, I hope that I have been cleared because I'm quite shocked that you think that I believe that I'm above the community. It's not true at all! --DeldiRe (talk) 14:23, September 21, 2013 (UTC)


 * I'll just quickly step in here and speak for myself: one other editor saying 'why not' (and not much else) in chat &ne; community input. While going ahead and creating the new article was a rash and ill-advised action, I greatly appreciate the work you're doing and I'm pretty sure I'd support new page(s) with the twitter stories at some point. Elseweyr (talk) 14:35, September 21, 2013 (UTC)


 * Sure that it was not a real community input, but I just said it to show that I still had a discussion about it (and you and I are actually almost the half of the active community^^). The implementation was maybe too fast but as I said, why is there the page about sollcomms (Emily Wong story) and not for the others ? It seems logic to fill this omission with an article with the same sort of layout. But yeah, we can start a vote about it.--DeldiRe (talk) 14:42, September 21, 2013 (UTC)


 * Hmmm. A regular contributor adds an article in good faith. It gets rejected & deleted as too problematic to do without community discussion, with a suggestion to put it to the community & some explanation of what needed to be discussed. THAT much all seems pretty routine to me. No noticeable damage to wiki or community, etc. What bothers me a lot more is why that led an admin, who in theory is supposed to be more mature & act as a guide and helper, to pour forth a stream of abuse, obscenities included, and start throwing around "one strike" warnings. That sort of thing does a lot more damage to the community (and by extension the wiki) than one article being created & deleted inside of a few hours. Cattlesquat (talk) 17:08, September 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * Im with Cattlesquat on this. Even if DeldiRe was in the wrong Temp your overreaction was completely uncalled for. And I did not work so hard to have the language restriction removed for you to launch obscenities in every post. Doing so severly weakens your argument and just makes you look childish. Garhdo (talk) 21:00, September 21, 2013 (UTC)

Well thanks all for support but I do not want to be the cause of a war so we should stop that here and be constructive instead. There is a great discussion on this project right there -> Forum:Twitter Lore and your input is more than welcome. Good night fellows ;) I would also suggest to listen that song to cool it off :D -> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5B0srsB0n3g it's trully epic. --DeldiRe (talk) 21:05, September 21, 2013 (UTC)

Re: ME4
I'll let the edits be reverted, but that does raise an issue in ME (insert title here), since the data is based on spin-offs, and every indication that ME4 is a non-spinoff games. I mean, I'll toe the line, but if it's coming from Bioware itself, even if it never comes to fruition, shouldn't it be stored for historical purposes?--Hawki (talk) 13:35, September 24, 2013 (UTC)


 * As you say, the only reason to put it is for historical reason. However I'm not sure that it has an added value to the wiki. Maybe you should ask an admin about that but IMO it is unneeded (except on a blog about ME4 developments info as you created) ;). In the future, you can also create a chapter about ideas stated by Bioware but who where rejected in the main version.

You should answer on your own talk page to avoid cross page discussion ;). --DeldiRe (talk) 13:37, September 24, 2013 (UTC)

Behind the scenes
Internet is down right now (well, not right now, but it's going on and off every few minutes). Once I sort that all out, I'll type up replies and so forth. – Ser Lavaeolus (talk) (contribs) 15:29, September 24, 2013 (UTC)

Multiplayer
I tried it today. #scarred4life Elseweyr (talk) 20:41, September 30, 2013 (UTC)

RAAAAA BAD KARMA BAAAD --DeldiRe (talk) 21:23, September 30, 2013 (UTC)

Jath'Amon
I saw your request, and I've got your back – though as with everything MEG, I can only provide cleanup in terms of spelling and grammar -_- Elseweyr (talk) 13:34, October 23, 2013 (UTC)

Once again, thanks for support, I will do it when I have a minute for myself ;) --DeldiRe (talk) 14:26, October 23, 2013 (UTC)


 * Changes done --DeldiRe (talk) 09:29, October 24, 2013 (UTC)

Your N7 Operations page
I have wallpapers (standard/wide, both official) for most if not all N7 Operations for ME3, and was just wondering if you wanted any of them added to that page. I added one for Operation Goliath but it was removed, I didn't know it was your personal page and not a public one lol.

--Mresc (talk) 07:46, November 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * HI, I just saw your message, I take the wallpapers from the official website but if I miss one of them I will come to you. Thanks for the hands up ;)--DeldiRe (talk) 12:16, December 7, 2013 (UTC)

M-597 Ladon
Hi,

I got that from temporaryEditor but the codex on ME3 Wii U does not put the entry on M-597 Ladon there. It has its own separate codex outside in the primary codex. Also, there's a note on the Ladon description article that should the Codex entry be transcribed, it should go to the description area instead.

112.209.27.87 20:51, December 2, 2013 (UTC)


 * Indeed, I just saw your discussion on temp's page. Hard to tell what to do with this specific info :) We should finish this discussion on the other page now ;) Thanks. --DeldiRe (talk) 21:56, December 2, 2013 (UTC)

N7 Operation edit
Hey, I've made an edit on your N7 Operations sandbox page and I would like you to see if you like it or not. Leave a reply ASAP. --Nord Ronnoc (talk) 19:36, December 11, 2013 (UTC)