User blog comment:Commdor/Game Informer ME3 Preview (Feb. 2012)/@comment-3053284-20120110110727/@comment-1691295-20120110160217

Thank you. I've deleted mine so there's not much trace.

It isn't much of a spoiler but I think that whenever you're expressing confidence about a certain story possibility based on that leaks, it's easy to miss how that can spoil to someone who hasn't read it.

One example I like to use (because no one will care) is the movie High Crimes. The whole premise of that movie was that a woman's husband has been arrested for a war crime. The basic idea being the movie is about this woman who's arguing that it's a case of mistaken identity etc. etc. Simple enough. However, the poster for that movie (at least for the DVD/VHS release) advertising something along the lines of "You won't believe the twist!". Immediately upon reading that it's obvious what the ending is. Merely saying there was a twist immediately gave away the ending to anyone observant.

That's the risk you run when talking about that leaked document. Not actually spoiling anything specific, but putting people on a train of thought that leads directly to a spoiler.

I'm not sure we have a rule against spoilers, but all I'm asking, personally and not as an admin, is to try and refrain from talking about it in a way that can inadvertently spoil.

Comments on the quality, whether or not you liked it are fine, but try to avoid commenting on the story directly. It's probably difficult, but I (and I'm sure others) would be incredibly grateful if you could keep that in mind.

Thanks.