User blog comment:Ralok/The monsters from the id/@comment-217683-20091221201809


 * But you can't call it "Id victims", because that name is pure speculation. All it said was "Monsters from the Id", it never says anything about the people being victims of these so-called "monsters. I personally felt that the "monsters" bit referred to their arrogance. As for a page for unknown species, if we had enough "unknown" species to justify a page, we could create one. As of now, you have come up with two "unknown" species, one of which doesn't even have a name, and I can only think of one more, also unnamed. Any article would either be not long enough to justify it's existence, or built on speculation, and we don't allow articles based entirely on speculation. Simple as that.
 * Finally, you really need to stop responding to people offering constructive criticism by saying things like "But what you did made you sound like an ass". We've been over this in the past, and language like that can get you blocked. If you can't handle criticism without lashing out, maybe this isn't the best place for you. At the end of the day, this is a resolved issue. We've debated this in the past, and nothing has changed in the interim. There isn't enough info to justify a page for the zeioph or the people of Junthor, and we don't know enough about the lystheni to classify them yet. Simple as that.