User blog comment:Kaloneous/Mass Effect 3 Ending DLC Denied and PAX/@comment-4043223-20120323231035/@comment-1841436-20120324231739

Both of which, the impossibility of loosing and the complete lack of a happy ending, Bioware had said, long ago, would be there. I did not hear an uproar back then. Only when things end up looking slightly bad for allies (which according so some, emans you should just give up, ebcusse there's no hope in trying)and you get a series of events that require some slight thought (which I find it ironic that people are calling the AI Star Child. It suggests they've seen 2001, yet find THIS confusing) that poeple will complain. And don't jump with with "all I want is more closer" because YOU seem to be in the minority, Mr. Only Closure Man. I mean really, harvesting and basically downloading higher organics to save all organics from destruction makes no sence? I'm the only one who can see how that might be logical to an AI? Oh, but your peace treaty with the geth and quarrians... because all peace treaties always work out, and the QUarrians didn't want to wipe out the egth afterwards, anyways, and there's absolutely no chance of a Terra Firma like organisation comming into place among Quarrian society, thereby forcing the geth's hand. And let's not forget Joker who, after hearing of a fullr etreat becasue the gorund assault failed and the citadel justs itting there not doing anything, adn the fleet being wipped out (people,a ccording to thse polls, also seem to think that this was a battle that could have at all been won and wasn't just a delaying tactic for the Crucible) would NEVER have retreated, especialy after seeing a massive wave of energy engulphing everything around. Certainly not.