User blog comment:Caramellson/Try Honesty?/@comment-1786741-20120913001421/@comment-24174486-20120914130153

"Name just one- oh wait, that might be too easy, name two major 'lies' the ending-'basher' got false."

Gladly!

1. The Reapers are synthetics killing organics so that organics won't be killed by synthetics. This one is one of my favourite examples of Retake idiocy, because not only does it revolve around ignoring what you're told in the ending of ME3, it also relies on ignoring the major relevation in the ending of ME2 as well.

2. You're forced to agree with the Catalyst. Ignoring the flawed premise of this argument—apparently if you don't explicitly voice disagreement, you invariably agree with something, but yet that same logic doesn't apply if you don't explicitly voice agreement?—it completely disregards the fact that you're perfectly free to choose the option that the Catalyst condemns, Destroy.

There's a lot more examples, but I chose these two because the evidence that proves them wrong is present in the last ten minutes that the anti-ending crowd seeks to demonize. These two "complaints" are so easily proven false via the dialogue in the ending that it's difficult for me to think that anyone who uses them has either actually seen the ending or is not consciously trying to deceive people.