User blog comment:N7EagleEye/New Mass Effect 4 Details/@comment-186.247.245.61-20130508003657

I totally agree with N7EagleEye talk, but as a oldschool fan i'm i may have a harder vision of it. Just because you are a fan like me, you dont need to hate my opnion about it.

All the ppl behind the creation of Mass Effect were so eager to use their -believed to be, "new techniques" such as religious undertones and the like, that it has caused several plot holes on the sequels of the first instalment. Honestly, if you are a small company -in comparison with the already R.I.P. Lucas Arts games, you probably will want to sign any fatty contract coming from everybody. EA was probably the one for Bioware? Big mistake.

If you dont know, you should. Take the Lazarus station clearly resembles a cruxifix and judging by the name 'Shepard' like almost 'Shepherd' you can think of that messiah ressurection and so on.

For me, these plot holes or misconceptions such as Shepard's death and destruction of the Normandy on the very beggining of ME2 just shows how they dont really know what they are doing as i believed after playing ME1, almost 5 years ago. Basically it was a cheap cop-out way of introducing the character creator for the series newcomers and forcing Shepard to work for Cerberus despite many players voicing their hatred of the idea.

Who did that, i dont know maybe EA or somebody else but i really doubt that the original writers would do that deliberately to such a game -you dont need to be a fan to respect that game's fact. Oh wait... one of them just had QUIT during the ME2 production Drew Karpyshyn, and yes they have thousands of excuses for that... go figure the right one.

The Mass Effect 3 ending mess was just a consequence of all of that no passion from EA's financial lead AND Bioware's naivety.