User blog comment:The Milkman/Indoctrination Theorists Say the Darndest Things, Part II/@comment-98.240.62.123-20121205130042/@comment-5830255-20121205202835

Ghardo: Do not try to claim the EC disproves IT. It is as ambiguous as ever, in fact MORE ambiguous than ever. Now we have narrators that talk in PRESENT tense, which means what you see has not already happened but instead has yet to happen in no way ensuring it will end up happening.

LilyheartsLiara: Ok? That doesn't exactly disprove IT.

Milkman: 1.The current resolution to the conflict is ambiguous as ever. This series is about pretending like it's about morally ambiguous choices, their illusions every time because they never have any notable impact. Furthermore you proved you ignore previous refutations once again, because as I said Indoctrination is not unchooseable... the very fact that it would be a choice begs to differ. Plenty of games involve going against the norm.

2.Actually double meanings are very big in Mass Effect. Furthermore you are wrong, we don't need a Shepard lives option, that was there to provoke speculations. Especially considering the first thoughts about it where how he could even be alive in the first place, or some people instantly got the impression he is on earth, etc.

3.IT with Reveal wouldn't be anti-climax, if their never good then that counts with the breathe scene too right?