User talk:Lksdjf

BSN Link
Here's the URL of the spreadsheet collection where I'm getting my information: http://social.bioware.com/forum/1/topic/343/index/12234370 --RandomGuy96 (talk) 08:23, December 2, 2012 (UTC)

I saw your conversation with TemporaryEditor78, and I will agree that some admins are not necessarily going to accept this as a valid source, even though it's our only source on such information. I don't always like using developer confirmation on everything because they're not going to answer the slew of questions that we bring up on a daily basis. We can run it through others like Commdor, who generally keep a more open policy on editing in general, and see what they think. For now, we should keep BSN stats off the wiki, but if we can get it approved, my reversions are only one undo away. Lksdjf (talk) 11:20, December 2, 2012 (UTC)

Undoing my edit
Why did you undo my edit on the Aite page? I noticed that you later reverted it to my version-are you edit boosting?--I never miss (talk) 13:28, December 12, 2012 (UTC)

I don't much care for edit counts; I just edit during balance changes and when ideas come to me. I reverted because I realized that I prefer the version that had one word substituted for four. Lksdjf (talk) 13:32, December 12, 2012 (UTC)

Biotic Charge's DR
Accordingly to Godless Paladin's Game Mechanics Clarifications and Information, Biotic Charge does grant 50% damage reduction for 4 seconds right after its use.

This is considered part of the Unlisted Sources of Damage Reduction, and such information was discovered by hacking the coalesced.bin within the game data.

Let me just make clear I'm not mad at you for removing that info from the Volus Vanguard. I'm merely showing that my edit was made with a consistent and tested basis. So if you agree, I'd like to keep the information I gave, but I'll leave to you to undo the edit.

Sincerely, --Bingbangpoe (talk) 23:07, December 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * And I should point out that is not a valid source. It isn't from a dev, and therefore cannot be used as a source. Either get a dev to say that or do not put it back into the article. Lancer1289 (talk) 00:01, December 19, 2012 (UTC)


 * What proof is acceptable to you? If I recall, you won't take PMs from mods on BSN as an acceptable source, and threads are very hit-and-miss in terms of mod replies, so will we ever get the data that we need? We don't have a lot of valuable data on this wiki because of certain policies meant to ensure accuracy. Lksdjf (talk) 01:16, December 21, 2012 (UTC)