User blog comment:Kaloneous/Mass Effect 3 Ending DLC Denied and PAX/@comment-4924919-20120315071403/@comment-4861206-20120315213523

Thank you! I release I'm in the minority because even though it wasn't the ending I necessarily wanted, I actually really liked the ending (Except for not knowing who lived and who died at the end). I believe it did a really good job of marking an end point for the ME timeline, as well as putting a definite end to Shepard's story arch rather then pull a halo 3, and leave it so that it can be revisited when the bills need to be payed regardless of whether or not if it makes any since narratively. Most of the flak the game is getting for the "non canonical plot holes" in it's ending(s) seem to be from fans who are upset about the great unknowns attached to the ending(s), particularly around the much loved characters in the series. People need to separate their emotional connection to the characters from whether or not the narrative makes sense, because with the exception of the Normandy crash landing on some random planet (which was pretty clearly a joke people! Or at the very least not meant to be taken seriously as it achieved a lost in space meets Giligan's isle level of campiness) everything has a very obvious, and logical explanation that I am more then willing to give to anybody who wants to hear it... well, logical for a series with FTL travel, giant sentient machines, and Hanar. How the hell can a jelly fish talk people!

I'm about 99.9% sure the single player aspect of this "leaked" DLC is BS. However if true I'm open to it. Even though I usually hate alternative endings, and I mean really hate them, I would be open to an ending a little closer to what I expected when i started the game... provided that it is free, otherwise we will have a totally legitimate DLC controversy on our hands.