User blog comment:Masseffect7/Why all the ME1 fanboys?/@comment-24200891-20140802075616

Every game of the series has advantages over the rest. ME1 has well written story, introduces lore of major races, has open world atmosphere as you mentioned, I like driving MAKO just I like driving car in real world. ME2 has better powers than ME1, the biggest number of the most interesting characters and companions, but the story is episodic rather than consistent unlike ME1 and ME3, but still interesting plot themes, ME2 has the biggest sets of enemy factions, it also has the biggest set of the best DLCs with interesting stories. ME3 has the best gameplay, but the story is full of plotholes, dialogues are boring and stupid, there old characters are no longer interesting and new ones are boring, social problem is unrealistic, interrace relationship is one thing, but organic-mashine relationship is another, it was too weird to me, I felt like I am bothered by not my problem, unrealistic problem, zombies aren't realistic, but I can compare them to infected cannon fodder of enemy army, DLCs also seemed incomplete to everyone. In ME2 and ME3 Shepard switching alligence and not getting punished by this was a plothole to me, Anderson and Hackett treated Shepard in ME3 like the commander never joined Cerberus in ME2, It would make bigger sense if in ME3 Shepard worked for none, but was a self-proclaimed savior of the galaxy, needed by people, even if they don't realise this until a certain moment in 1/4 or 1/5 of the game.