User blog comment:Lancer1289/Gamespot Releases Reader's Choices/@comment-99.60.184.154-20110113214444

Both games are great. But for different reasons. They simply different types of games.

RDR had a better ending, but I found that it tended to drag more in the middle, and the side missions simply were not fairly dull. The ME2 story, for me, was up to par with the orginal and the dialouge was way more interesting. But really, RDR wasn't that far behind in many ways. What is probably the clear thing for that let me down in ME2 was the combat. It still played way to similarily to ME and ME combat was awful. RDR is fluid, and Deadeye was a blast to use.

As far as DLC is concerned, the first 3 DLC for RDR I didn't much care for. Good but, kinda lame at the same time. Undead Nightmare is deffinately worth buying, simply because it is cheep, big, and most of all fun. ME2 DLC on the other hand has some nice free DLC right off the bat, with Kasumi, Overlord, and LotSB priced reaonsably, and most of them are must haves.

If I would have a list of my Top 3 Games of 2010, ME2 would be 1st, RDR 2nd, and (Insert Name Here) 3rd. Just my opinions.