User blog comment:-Algol-/Of policies, admins and the community/@comment-1958269-20130128033306/@comment-5131329-20130128163413

So, by that context, we're going to vote out the leaders, and replace them with a main antagonist?

Sorry, Star Wars marathon on TV again. Anyway, it does in fact seem like we may be heading there, if the fact that if (random example name, coincidences are unintentional) "JoeSchmo1" came to this Wiki, made a good change to a page, and some admin went "Nope, you didn't read our policies, your edit is being undone." And I have seen legit edits disapear from pages from time to time.

This is a primary reason as to why I don't generally edit pages on wikis (that, and what I know is either (A) already on the page, or (B) about the books I never read). Taking into account recent events, and the general BS of the canvassing accusation (completely baseless BTW, not trying to start that debate again) and passing a rule that, even without the 2(two) people who signed up to vote No, still would have been 8-7 against, I third (ot forth?) this idea.