Forum:Power Combos - ordering

Forums: Index > Projects > Power Combos - ordering

The form below serves as a tool to describe the project. The form is intended to be as specific as possible to what the project is to accomplish.

• Please place all comments under the Comments heading.
• If there is a discussion page linked, then be sure to check it out as well.
• Also please do not create any articles unless all the details have been worked out, or at least the majority of them.
• Once the article/project has been created/finished, please put a mention that the article/project is completed and provide a redirect to the relevant article/s and talk page/s.

If any new things come up after the project proposal's passing, then please shift the discussion to the relevant article talk page/s.

If you have any questions on how to fill out the form, or any other question, please refer to the Project Forum talk page.

Project:

Formal vote on previously presented reordering of power lists and some additional tweaks

Currently developed by: Elseweyr

Developer(s) notes: -

Status last updated: 16:10, March 2, 2015 (UTC)

Page location: User:Elseweyr/Sandbox/Power Combos
Page should contain: The source and detonator power lists should be side-by-side for improved readability
Supporting links or images: -
Discussion on: this page

Other Notes

In a previous project to reformat the Power Combos article (Forum:Power Combos - Replacing lists with tables), a side-by-side reordering of the power lists was suggested as part of the proposal. The reordering would make it easier to eye possible combinations as well as reduce the article's length, both of which should improve overall readability. The change was briefly discussed but never included in the final proposal nor implemented, which this project serves to amend.

For convenience:

• Power Combos - current
• User:Elseweyr/Sandbox/Power Combos - suggested

Comments

Any feedback and further suggestions can be left here. Elseweyr ^{talk • stalk} 13:00:12, 2014-12-30 (UTC)

isn't it just Shield Mastery (melee attack with cryo/fire shield evolution) rather than N7 Paladin melee attack (with Shield Mastery fire/cryo shield evolution)? the prevailing convention in the article is power name then which evolution gives the effect (plus the latter term is a tad unwieldly and repetitive [shield mastery -is- n7paladin-only]) T̴̴͕̲̞̳̖̼̱͒͛̎͒ͫ̃ͧeͩ̈̽̈҉͓̝̰̼̦̫̤̀͠m̫̪̪̯̻͎̫̅̇̓̇͌̚p̸̙̝̓̓͌ͨ͆ͣͥ̂̕o͒̽͐̽͏̞̬̻͕͔͕͚̰͍͠͞ṙ̢̞͚͈̹̰ͨ̓ͭ̈́̌ạ̢̧̪̹̺̺̣̹̲͂͆̏ͪͨ͒ͭř̹͈͜͠y̷͍̻̜̹̼̾̽̈́e̵̹̼̟̦͚͐̈́͌͘d͉̲̣̻͉̱͗̅ḭ̷̻̆͋̆̓̔͝t̨͍̦̫̗͂̅̍̋̆ͩ͝ộ̫̟̬̳̝̲̾ͫ̒̿ͮ̑̚rͯ̎ͨͭ̄̿̽͛҉̠̫̱̠̘̘̲́ͅ7̩̻ͤͩͨ͝͡8̜̣̙͇̻ͨ͛͛̆͒̆̽̒͐͜͡ ͥ̍̉̃̇ͥ̓ͨ͏̕҉̥̹͓̗̤̠̖̤ (talk) 13:27, December 30, 2014 (UTC)

Yes; since Shield Mastery upgraded in a specific way is ultimately the power required for the priming effect, I'm certainly not personally opposed to changing the entry. The leader of the previous project was mainly concerned with the Synergies table, which was in fact changed to list "Shield Mastery" instead, so I guess the power lists should have been updated to reflect that. I'll edit the article and update my sandbox. Elseweyr ^{talk • stalk} 14:55:30, 2014-12-30 (UTC)

Good idea, it's way much clearer. I would also suggest to replace the "note" about asteriks below as it seems to be too far from the related lists.--DeldiRe (talk) 09:21, January 5, 2015 (UTC)

I'd totally forgotten about this project... I agree the note about the asterisks at the beginning of the article is inadequate, so in the latest change to the proposed version I added a footnote to each combo type section.

If nothing else comes up within a day or so, I'll open voting. Elseweyr ^{talk • stalk} 28 Feb 2015, 16:34:47 (UTC)

Voting

The Power Combos article will be updated to the proposed version.

Yes

1. Elseweyr ^{talk • stalk} March 2, 2015, 16:10:55 (UTC)
2. Still very long article but I support the addition. I also suggest some screenshots to make the article nicer. --DeldiRe (talk) 16:22, March 2, 2015 (UTC)
3. Cattlesquat (talk) 23:24, March 2, 2015 (UTC)
4. Garhdo (talk) 06:25, March 4, 2015 (UTC)
5. T̴̴͕̲̞̳̖̼̱͒͛̎͒ͫ̃ͧeͩ̈̽̈҉͓̝̰̼̦̫̤̀͠m̫̪̪̯̻͎̫̅̇̓̇͌̚p̸̙̝̓̓͌ͨ͆ͣͥ̂̕o͒̽͐̽͏̞̬̻͕͔͕͚̰͍͠͞ṙ̢̞͚͈̹̰ͨ̓ͭ̈́̌ạ̢̧̪̹̺̺̣̹̲͂͆̏ͪͨ͒ͭř̹͈͜͠y̷͍̻̜̹̼̾̽̈́e̵̹̼̟̦͚͐̈́͌͘d͉̲̣̻͉̱͗̅ḭ̷̻̆͋̆̓̔͝t̨͍̦̫̗͂̅̍̋̆ͩ͝ộ̫̟̬̳̝̲̾ͫ̒̿ͮ̑̚rͯ̎ͨͭ̄̿̽͛҉̠̫̱̠̘̘̲́ͅ7̩̻ͤͩͨ͝͡8̜̣̙͇̻ͨ͛͛̆͒̆̽̒͐͜͡ ͥ̍̉̃̇ͥ̓ͨ͏̕҉̥̹͓̗̤̠̖̤ (talk) 11:59, March 4, 2015 (UTC)

Neutral

---

The voting period has concluded and the proposal has passed 5-0-0. Elseweyr ^{talk • stalk} March 10, 2015, 00:05:55 (UTC)