|
Delete Proposal[]
What is stated in the tag is quite accurate in this case, which is also why I removed the stub tag. Prangley is just too minor of a character to warrant a full article. He is only encountered in one mission and not mentioned after that, so there is little to say about him. He, like many other characters, is better left mentioned in their appropriate walkthrough. If we get a DLC where he is mentioned further, then we can revisit this idea but until then, there is barely enough information for a paragraph. Lancer1289 (talk) 15:35, September 2, 2012 (UTC)
- Shouldn't this be a "redirect proposal"? Anyway, I created the page because he is a surrogate character for Jack, and other surrogate characters have individual pages, e.g. Urdnot Dagg. Therefore, I am against deletion. Trandra (talk) 15:57, September 2, 2012 (UTC)
- Against as well. Prangley has enough variability in his role that I think he's worth holding on to. --Mr. Mittens (talk) 15:59, September 2, 2012 (UTC)
Support, too minor of a character, and different from other "surrogate" characters as he only appears in one mission and gets very little screen time.--Legionwrex (talk) 16:34, September 2, 2012 (UTC)
- If he is a surrogate character, then I also oppose deletion. In the event of deletion, I would prefer that this be redirected to the Grissom Academy mission article. -- Commdor (Talk) 16:36, September 2, 2012 (UTC)
With a vote of 3-2, the deletion proposal has been rejected. The article will not be deleted. Trandra (talk) 15:54, September 9, 2012 (UTC)