Mass Effect Wiki
Mass Effect Wiki

Welcome to Mass Effect Wiki![]

Hi, welcome to Mass Effect Wiki! Thanks for your edit to the User:TheKingLerp page.

If you haven't already, please sign in and create a user name! It's free, and it'll help you keep track of all your edits.

If you're new to wikis, please read the tutorial at Wikia Community Central.

Be sure to check out our Style Guide and Community Guidelines to help you get started. In particular, be aware of our policies concerning the capitalization of alien race names and information sourcing.

Leave a message at the help desk or on my talk page if you need help with anything! Temporaryeditor78 (talk) 20:59, August 24, 2015 (UTC)

Useless Argument[]

"I'm 99.9% sure Tali specifically says that Quarians are only allowed one child except under special circumstances.)" See please what is "Zero population growth". "A loosely defined goal of ZPG is to match the replacement fertility rate, which is the average number of children per woman which would hold the population constant. This replacement fertility will depend on mortality rates and the sex ratio at birth, and varies from around 2.1 in developed countries to over 3.0 in some developing countries." —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sambian (talk · contr).

irrelevant. we go by information the characters share, not what they -aught- to be in real life. tali did say that the policy is repealed when they grow too few, so this discussion is just about pointless to put it mildly. T̴̴͕̲̞̳̖̼̱͒͛̎͒ͫ̃ͧeͩ̈̽̈҉͓̝̰̼̦̫̤̀͠m̫̪̪̯̻͎̫̅̇̓̇͌̚p̸̙̝̓̓͌ͨ͆ͣͥ̂̕o͒̽͐̽͏̞̬̻͕͔͕͚̰͍͠͞ṙ̢̞͚͈̹̰ͨ̓ͭ̈́̌ạ̢̧̪̹̺̺̣̹̲͂͆̏ͪͨ͒ͭř̹͈͜͠y̷͍̻̜̹̼̾̽̈́e̵̹̼̟̦͚͐̈́͌͘d͉̲̣̻͉̱͗̅ḭ̷̻̆͋̆̓̔͝t̨͍̦̫̗͂̅̍̋̆ͩ͝ộ̫̟̬̳̝̲̾ͫ̒̿ͮ̑̚rͯ̎ͨͭ̄̿̽͛҉̠̫̱̠̘̘̲́ͅ7̩̻ͤͩͨ͝͡8̜̣̙͇̻ͨ͛͛̆͒̆̽̒͐͜͡ ͥ̍̉̃̇ͥ̓ͨ͏̕҉̥̹͓̗̤̠̖̤ (talk) 10:33, September 4, 2015 (UTC)

If quarians had only one child, they would have died out. This is a mathematical law!!! Tali misspoke. If Tali said 2x2=7, then You have also recorded it as a fact? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sambian (talk · contr).

Still irrelevant. Temp said it perfectly fine: It was said in-game. And again, Tali said if the population gets too low, they temporarily lift the policy. China has a one-child-per-couple rule, and you don't see them dying out. TheKingLerp (talk) 20:00, September 4, 2015 (UTC)

Do you want to prove that 2x2=7? Did You study arithmetic? One more time - see please what is "Zero population growth". China has a one-child-per-couple rule only a few decades! As well, пot everyone follows the law, plus, пot everyone was register children. Now China has overturned this law. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sambian (talk · contr).

Ok great, thanks for proving my point. Zero population growth is exactly what the Quarians want. Too many, resources get strained. Too few, they risk extinction. TheKingLerp (talk) 23:34, September 4, 2015 (UTC)

Мaybe Tali misspoke and meant that allowed to have one child on each quarian? Two for family. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sambian (talk · contr).

Doubtful. But regardless, canon is canon. And please remember to sign your posts on Talk pages with four tildes. (These things ~) TheKingLerp (talk) 13:37, September 5, 2015 (UTC)

Doubtful? But only this variant can fix stupidity, said the authors of the game about "Zero population growth"! Only scientific canon is canon! It is SF game!—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sambian (talk · contr).

I can't even understand what you're trying to say. You flat-out proved my point by linking me to ZPG, so please drop it. And again, SIGN YOUR POSTS TheKingLerp (talk) 15:32, September 5, 2015 (UTC)


Hi, it is very sorry you just deleted my edit at vangurd guide cyro section.

I wrote that for several hours, expecting someone will reedit my pour sentences.

Well, Englisg is not my mother tongue.

using squad cryo ammo is surely well working at insanity difficulty.

It is better than using mordin's frost power.

all that wroten in wikia page is just using vanguard as weak biotic.

you know vanguard is combat + biotic.

if one use vanguard as combat style, like soldier very aggressive way it is, this might be the answer.

while I played vanguard on insanity difficulty several time, this perpectly makes sence.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kkhan922 (talk · contr).

Well I apologize that I had to get rid of your edit. I tried to reword it at first, but I couldn't figure out what exactly you were trying to say most of the time. And if you are not a native English speaker, I think it might be more valuable for you to make the edit to the version of the Mass Effect wiki that is written in your native tongue. Oh, and please sign your posts with four tildes (These things ~) TheKingLerp (talk)

Garrus discussion[]

To clarify, then shouldn't the other parts of Garrus' page be removed regarding if he joined C-Sec or did Spectre training after ME1's events, as those are influenced by the player's choice as well?

Mechemik (talk) 22:32, January 6, 2016 (UTC)

That's fair. Regardless, it was oddly worded and "ME1" isn't used within articles. It's informal, and technically incorrect. I suppose you can readd the information in a way that flows better and is written a tad more formally. TheKingLerp (talk) 22:44, January 6, 2016 (UTC)
Fair enough. I'll think of a better way to word it so it flows better with the article.

Mechemik (talk) 23:31, January 6, 2016 (UTC)

And this time, I won't just undo the edit, I'll try to see what we can do to improve it. TheKingLerp (talk) 23:48, January 6, 2016 (UTC)

RE: interwiki[]

Thanks for the hint. I apologize for any inconvenience.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Donnerkiesel (talk · contr).

It's all good. And don't forget to sign your talk page posts with four ~ TheKingLerp (talk) 14:59, March 6, 2016 (UTC)


No problem, but the next time you have to look at the history of the changed article to determine who made the appropriate changes. thanks in advance - Donnerkiesel (talk) 16:26, March 6, 2016 (UTC)

edit: <!-- interwiki links --> not my fault ... Donnerkiesel (talk) 17:15, March 6, 2016 (UTC)


Hi, you removed my edits without contacting me. Not only is that rude, it is also bad for the wiki. My edits have reason. There is a continuity error regarding thermal clips. You can remove the edits, but that doesn't mean there isn't a continuity error. I added it and this is a wiki, which is intended to present information. AeonsLegend (contact me) 09:29, March 16, 2016 (UTC)

The edits were extremely unprofessional (A section titled "Goofs," really?). THAT is bad for the wiki. And I don't need to contact you first, I just gave the reasoning in my edits. And who's to say that thermal clips didn't just exist in the ME universe, but simply weren't featured in the first game? Is it also a continuity error that the vorcha and drell weren't Mass Effect? No. It's just a coincidence that they aren't encountered. TheKingLerp (talk) 11:02, March 16, 2016 (UTC)
It is a continuity error because it is specifically stated in both ME2 and ME3 that Thermal Clips were introduced AFTER the Geth attack and weren't used BEFORE. That means a weapon which is 40 years old wouldn't have a Thermal Clip. Your comparison with the Vorcha and Drell doesn't make sense. They didn't transform a species into Vorcha. They did transform cooling down into expending a Thermal Clip. It is an actual canon change in how weapons worked before ME1 and ME2. It's not a fan made idea, it's not speculation. It's fact.
For reference:
Also, you don't own the wiki, so don't act like you do. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by AeonsLegend (talk · contr).
i'll have to uphold the reverts. read the codex entry. then read it again. nowhere is it stated that the geth invented the thermal clips. they adopted them - meaning, put this, zaeed's comments and shep's knowledge together, it actually supports the notion that the tech has been around for some time, just not widespread to the level we see in ME2 (conrad isn't military -and- is oblivious to a lot of things, so not exactly someone who would know). you don't "adopt" something that doesn't exist in the first place. it's fact that thermal clips saw widespread "adoption" after the battle of the citadel. it's speculation to assume they've only been invented recently when there are fairly reliable statements and incidents that support the opposite.
it's also entirely possible that zaeed might've been talking about the ammo block inside the weapon (he did cut down a hundred batarian mooks, so running out of actual ammo isn't out of the question), but that then devolves into a discussion of whether the terms "magazine" and "clip" were actually used correctly here.
the only way "continuity error" can be admitted is if bioware itself admits to a continuity error. they've done so in the past, but they haven't with this issue, something they would've been made aware of years ago. it's their rules, we run with it. T̴̴͕̲̞̳̖̼̱͒͛̎͒ͫ̃ͧeͩ̈̽̈҉͓̝̰̼̦̫̤̀͠m̫̪̪̯̻͎̫̅̇̓̇͌̚p̸̙̝̓̓͌ͨ͆ͣͥ̂̕o͒̽͐̽͏̞̬̻͕͔͕͚̰͍͠͞ṙ̢̞͚͈̹̰ͨ̓ͭ̈́̌ạ̢̧̪̹̺̺̣̹̲͂͆̏ͪͨ͒ͭř̹͈͜͠y̷͍̻̜̹̼̾̽̈́e̵̹̼̟̦͚͐̈́͌͘d͉̲̣̻͉̱͗̅ḭ̷̻̆͋̆̓̔͝t̨͍̦̫̗͂̅̍̋̆ͩ͝ộ̫̟̬̳̝̲̾ͫ̒̿ͮ̑̚rͯ̎ͨͭ̄̿̽͛҉̠̫̱̠̘̘̲́ͅ7̩̻ͤͩͨ͝͡8̜̣̙͇̻ͨ͛͛̆͒̆̽̒͐͜͡ ͥ̍̉̃̇ͥ̓ͨ͏̕҉̥̹͓̗̤̠̖̤ (talk) 17:02, March 16, 2016 (UTC)
Fine fine fine.AeonsLegend (contact me) 17:27, March 16, 2016 (UTC)


Hey Whats up? Im just a random visitor on this Wika and i see you edit alot. Maybe i'll see you around. I'll just be a typo hunter on this wikia. TheDwellerCamp (talk) 00:11, April 12, 2016 (UTC)

Oh hello. Nice to meet you, and I'm glad to see a new member to the wiki. Quick tip for you. If someone, especially someone with a white name (Ex. Elseweyr) undoes an edit of yours, don't be offended or discouraged. This wiki is held to a VERY high standard and the admins always have good reasons for their edits, even if they don't say so right away. You can argue with them, but don't argue it by undoing their undo, go to their talk page. Edit-warring doesn't accomplish anything. I'm just saying all this because I feel like the Andromeda Galaxy page is going to be deleted very shortly by an admin.

EDIT: Yep, I was right. It was deleted. Probably since the game isn't out yet, it's not part of the canon universe yet. TheKingLerp (talk) 00:24, April 12, 2016 (UTC)

Ah yeah I get the emails. I don't even bother turning hem off because Gmail does a good job of sorting them. Anyways, I guess thats true because its not guaranteed to be in the canon universe. But we'll see when we play it. TheDwellerCamp (talk) 13:55, April 15, 2016 (UTC)

True that TheKingLerp (talk) 02:33, April 16, 2016 (UTC)
If I may ask, how "high" of a standard does this wikia have? TheDwellerCamp (talk) 17:27, April 21, 2016 (UTC)
Player guides and other advice related articles and sections typically contain some grammatical errors, but actual articles (Especially featured articles) are typically close to flawless. Vandalism is undone very quickly too, so the admins are almost always watching and making sure everything's going well. So pretty high standards in my opinion. Even edits that don't do much at all (Like the American vs. the British spellings of words like color and colour) are typically undone as they are seen as "unnecessary edits." TheKingLerp (talk) 03:05, April 22, 2016 (UTC)

Undo Discussion[]

Mrjoshua24 (talk) 11:53, April 28, 2016 (UTC) hey I want to ask why you reversed my edit, its true, even mac walters admits it

May I see the source? TheKingLerp (talk) 19:44, April 28, 2016 (UTC)

Mrjoshua24 (talk) 16:23, April 29, 2016 (UTC) sorry the ending shows 2 moons, and zorya has 2 moons almost the same way but its very ambiguous or vague, hopefully Andromeda will tell more

Then that is speculation and cannot be used in articles. Sorry. TheKingLerp (talk) 19:27, April 29, 2016 (UTC)


I'm not here to argue with you, frankly I don't care. If the dictators of the wiki are happy with it the way it stands, then c'est la vie. If you know for a FACT that someone loves pets (we're talking real life here) and they stand idly by and watch someone butcher animals that would be something that at the very bloody least, should make you scratch your head. Now it's stated in game in dialog that Kaiden is biotic, gets headaches and has certain feelings about how biotics should be treated, rights they should have etc. Now I don't care if it's devs being lazy, cut content or a simple oversight it's definitely NOT irrelevant, it's friggen noteworthy. I'm playing the game right now, I'm in my forties. My point was it would have been nice to have a simple little note on the quest page stating you don't need this twit because he's got the emotional reactions of a potato in this instance. Personally I hate him and would have brought someone else had I remembered which is why I had the wiki up to check quests before I did them. Obviously won't be using this as a resource seeing as how having complete information is somehow taboo. Heading back to the game, maybe I'll download a Gamefaqs walkthrough. Just fyi, if the ops or whatever the "gods" are called here want to do this right they should really look at some well-done wikis like Borderlands. Contributors have provided literally thousands of results for things like random loot boxes and at no time is anyone saying "No thanks we don't want information added, we'll just keep the narrow view we've got."

Yes I said I didn't care and that's obviously incorrect. I'm fed up with so many good games having such hard to use wikis and all because of control freaks being able to literally erase someone's work. I did actually create a login once, after seeing how often people undo, miscorrect and generally eff up what others add I don't bother to login anymore. Don't take this personally, I'm not meaning to pick on you, it's just you parroted the attitude that always seems to find it's way into these online sources. My point is there's enough bloody censorship going on on what's supposed to be "a free exchange of ideas and information" by governments, special interest groups and religious nuts the last thing the internet needs is everyone else helping to rip it apart. What the hell harm does adding two lines of text to quests do? If I'm looking up a quest I'm reading it to know what I'm dealing with before I do it so I can plan. If I don't need someone, that to anyone with common sense would have an impact, then I'd like to know that. If it was Bioware's oversight I don't care. It's not pointing out flaws or ripping on the writing, it's stating a fact: Kaiden has no special impact at all on the mission.
Look, I was going to add info that might be missing as I played, maybe talk to someone about putting up better pages for armor/weapons and the like with clearer information but I just don't see why now. Obviously if someone gave a damn they'd have done it sooner, this game is how old now? You have fun doing whatever you're doing here, I'm going to play the game and keep my own notes so I get ALL the information, not just what some strangers thinks is "relevant". 15:15, June 10, 2016 (UTC)


the policy has always been discussion and votation FIRST before committing any changes, not the other way around. you are violating that. T̴̴͕̲̞̳̖̼̱͒͛̎͒ͫ̃ͧeͩ̈̽̈҉͓̝̰̼̦̫̤̀͠m̫̪̪̯̻͎̫̅̇̓̇͌̚p̸̙̝̓̓͌ͨ͆ͣͥ̂̕o͒̽͐̽͏̞̬̻͕͔͕͚̰͍͠͞ṙ̢̞͚͈̹̰ͨ̓ͭ̈́̌ạ̢̧̪̹̺̺̣̹̲͂͆̏ͪͨ͒ͭř̹͈͜͠y̷͍̻̜̹̼̾̽̈́e̵̹̼̟̦͚͐̈́͌͘d͉̲̣̻͉̱͗̅ḭ̷̻̆͋̆̓̔͝t̨͍̦̫̗͂̅̍̋̆ͩ͝ộ̫̟̬̳̝̲̾ͫ̒̿ͮ̑̚rͯ̎ͨͭ̄̿̽͛҉̠̫̱̠̘̘̲́ͅ7̩̻ͤͩͨ͝͡8̜̣̙͇̻ͨ͛͛̆͒̆̽̒͐͜͡ ͥ̍̉̃̇ͥ̓ͨ͏̕҉̥̹͓̗̤̠̖̤ (talk) 05:20, June 22, 2016 (UTC)

Well I apologize, but I started a discussion the talk page, then in my initial revert I even said I wasn't trying to edit-war, I just wanted to get the talk started and you are essentially ignoring it. TheKingLerp (talk) 06:10, June 22, 2016 (UTC)

Get tired of sucking Temp's dick just to have him shit on you yet? FFS he still doesn't give reasons for his reverts check his contributions. Shouldn't be an admin. His skill with edits doesn't justify his blatant flaming of other users and the disrespectful, elitist tone he takes with everyone.